Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: New Evidence
(youtu.be)
Comments (4)
sorted by:
I don't agree with this at all. Hear me out:
Erika gives a press conference the day after her husband was shot. Why? To announce TPUSA will continue? Who wouldn't think that, and why was that necessary to announce in that short of time? I am a spouse. If I watched my spouse killed on the news, the last thing I would be thinking about within 24 hours would be our company/empire/etc.
I found Erika to be whispering, mad, tearful (with no tears) almost as if I was watching Biden's press conferences from 2020-2024.
One video showing the same shot, never pulled from YouTube, Social Media, etc. for days. Conservatives are normally scrubbed of their posts within hours. This one angled video was allowed to be seen for days.
Two thousand college kids were in attendance of Charlie being 'shot'. Where is the outrage of parents at the college calling for counseling and much-needed help for these traumatized students?
The text messages were unbelievable. NO WAY. Who engages in texts, storybook-long with full explanation of who owns the gun, how long this was planned, how the gun was placed and where, with the entire narrative spelled out as an answer to all the questions the public would have.
No blood, except on the shirt and a small smear on a table.
SIM cards from cameras removed, with a follow up prime time news update as to why.
Erika's display on Instagram feeling her husband's body, showing the world what she lost, with perfectly manicure fingernails. How fortunate for her she didn't have one chip or crack in those nails. How beautiful to show the world how much she loved her husband. Jesus, Lord above, is nothing fricking sacred and private anymore? Does anyone need to see that, or want to?
And the funeral... wow. How impressive that was arranged in such a short period of time. How fake as hell that once again, there was not one tear shed from a grieving wife, who blotted her heavily applied makeup and resolved she would carry on the legacy of her husband whom she loved very much. Not a tear. Not a smear of mascara. Not believable.
This entire thing stinks... from start to finish.
This is JFK being assassinated, this is 9/11 terrorist attacks, this is the Golf War coverage fuckery, and I am absolutely sick that this fuckery continues under the Trump administration. I thought we were better than this.
Well said. Ericka's speech gave me the same feeling at the time i watched it, and I told my gf that I didnt feel that she was genuine at all with her lack of tears and her whispers of "i love you baby." I dont know what to make of it all. Candace Owen's is on a truth seeking rampage, but now shes talking about valves and how they're tied to the deep state and that he may have been shot from a trap door under him...ugh, what? I really pray that we'll get to the bottom of his execution, but youre right - there are many lies being told just like the "terror" events in USA's past.
None of this makes any sense
Candace saw the video from the camera behind Charlie and said there was no blood, not gore, no shots, nothing.
I don’t necessarily agree with this video.
I reviewed that video earlier. That’s not blood coming out on the left, that’s either the wire from his mic or necklace. In the first video he shows you can’t see the black object at the bottom left of his face before the thin black line but in the second video he shows you can see it but he ignores it.
The physics of his shirt doesn’t match the bullet coming from behind. If it came from behind you would see the exit would in the front before the shirt comes up. His shirt goes up before seeing the wound because the drag from the bullet coming from the front pulled it up.