I agree with what you’re saying but saying that their models are just hype isn’t true. Sonnet and Opus (when not nerfed) are the best models out right now. I don’t like Anthropic as a company but if you’re trying to get good quality code from an LLM… their models are the best.

GitHub copilot is the most cost efficient subscription that gives you access to open ai and anthropic models with a lower context window.

Anthropic subscriptions are really if you want their CLI / desktop app with cowork / dispatch etc. They recently released routines which are kinda great to be honest.

I mainly use opencode… but Claude code is actually pretty good now. Someone took the leaked code and made OpenClaude. I haven’t tried that yet

Wait…. People are still following Jordan Sathers.. one of the OG grifters?

Fury is a unique word to use.

Organizations and/or people that wish to do us harm during this time we be met with swift fury

Operation Epic Fury

I deleted my comment because I misread the post!

It’s a great tool to be worded and phrased like every other post written with AI. It’s also biased towards the perspective you’re writing it from. It basically writes something with the confidence of being absolutely correct with what it’s saying when it’s actually only 80-90% true.

If I read one more AI generated post….

Almost every single tweet and post is AI generated now…

This is a great response and I agree with everything you’re saying here. I appreciate you unpacking it because it describes a lot more than your first response which seemed mostly as an attack towards me.

I’m disappointed because you went straight to calling someone who is on your team a shill / useful idiot.. might be worth while to self reflect and make sure you’re not too jaded.

I’ve been posting on this board for years and pro Trump.. loved the Iran write up from sleepydude… you calling me a shill or useful idiot is ridiculous. I’m pretty disappointed with you right now.

Also you said a lot of things that didn’t answer what I was asking.

I’m going to assume and hope you’re just having a bad day.

She has said several times that she is not talking about all Jewish people. She even talks positively about Jewish people who agree with her. Sounds like you are making drastic world view changes regarding her based on a misunderstanding.

Also in regards to being an obsession.. what would you call your post history or any of us who are here everyday?

President Donald Trump said he was caught off guard by Iran’s decision to strike countries he described as neutral, calling the move unexpected and escalatory.

“Amazingly, they’re hitting countries that were neutral,” Trump said, noting some of those nations had “nothing to do with what’s going on” until missiles were launched at them.

He suggested history will eventually explain the reasoning but argued the strikes reveal “the level of evil that we’re dealing with.”

Saving Israel for last. Can’t wait to see how that plays out.

Wish people wouldn’t use LLMs as much, the writing style gets old.

It doesn’t really matter if he violates international law. He already violated it capturing Maduro. It’s whether anyone tries to enforce it or not.

Might be the first time I’ve been accused of being a bot here.. really interesting that you didn’t bother going through my post history. Do you expect me to post here every day or something?

I’m confused, the comments say that what the tweet OP said was wrong and then OP agreed that it’s wrong?

I’m referencing what they retweeted.

Yeah I mean I definitely agree with you on that.

None of this is for us, Its for the normies.

They all seem to be turning on eachother

I’m just saying it all stinks

These are all general statements/ claims.

If you’re going to make a supposition, what is the basis of that supposition other than just saying it… what information do you believe was given to Candace that isn’t true to create a schism. Are people responding to this information appropriately.. what has Candace said that stinks?

It’s not about claiming to have the truth… it’s is what they are saying is true or not.

My problem with this is you made some claims and then you kind of dodge clarifying the specifics. The other problem is that this entire response didn’t really say anything.

There is no dividing or jumping all in… there is only following the truth. Eventually when following the truth you see them slip up and you course correct. Trump creates scenarios where people out themselves because they are forced to respond. That is what we are seeing happen with the influencers. Candace is on the line of truth and all of these influencers are being shaken off of it.

If you haven’t been watching her streams you can’t in good faith wave it off. The truth doesn’t care about unity or division.

Again you are not watching her streams. She has provided evidence for everything that she has brought up…

I loved when they said she was lying about the text messages so she provided the text messages and then they attacked her for releasing the text messages. You can’t make this up.

What exact information are you saying is being fed to her?

Also how exactly is her asking questions and pointing out verifiable lies causing a schism in alt media? Nothing she has said should be causing the reactions she is getting.

If you’re following the stream it’s very easy to see who is being genuine and who isn’t.

Catturd is really trying to say that Candace is as evil as Fauci because she is asking questions?

Except Candace is getting the mockingbird treatment. That doesn’t fit well in any of the counter theories.

Which ones are on your list?

You would only think this if you didn’t actually watch her streams.