the why is a way to obscure everything no real proof just her making claims with nothing to back them up......this is a pattern with her on key issues. she will do real reporting and then insert a claim that has no real Baisis. these claims will have real info that's accurate, but she will make a claim that the evidence being used is can bring people to multiple conclusions that conflict with each other or she will make a claim that has no way of being checked out... into all of this will be inserted a piece of propaganda that an intelligence service wants to be planted that will be ran with by others that only replay claims seen on social media.
the why is a way to obscure everything no real proof just her making claims with nothing to back them up......this is a pattern with her on key issues. she will do real reporting and then insert a claim that has no real Baisis. these claims will have real info that's accurate, but she will make a claim that the evidence being used is can bring people to multiple conclusions that conflict with each other or she will make a claim that has no way of being checked out... into all of this will be inserted a piece of propaganda that an intelligence service wants to be planted that will be ran with by others that only replay claims seen on social media.
I mean, she was pretty clear here.
Confirm or deny my claims, if you deny them I will drop contradictory evidence.
Doesn’t really fit what you’re laying out here, though I do appreciate your perspective.
She never drops the evidence, is what he’s suggesting.
I get that, but are her challenges ever met? Asking sincerely.