That said, it's good for impartial folks to dig and research, and dig for facts and answers and ask questions. But if one latches on to a conclusion preemptively, then impartiality tends to suffer.
I've spent about 27–30 hours of digging in to all the theories on where the gunman was. How many gunman. Where did the shot come from… Etc. etc.
I stayed largely silent on this topic for the last three weeks and I've put in roughly one – four hours daily into careful research.
All that research points definitively at the Mike being the culprit. Nothing else explains the movement of his shirt. I don't even know how many videos I've watched in slow motion of all kinds of bullets hitting ballistics manikins with shirts on to try to duplicate the look. Nothing at all duplicates the movement/look of his shirt. Not even a 50 caliber at close range in any of the videos I've seen made the shirt move even a fraction as much as his moved.
Couple that with the fact that three of his bodyguards immediately crowded around him and removed something. It's indisputable given the high-quality videos that I've seen that they did not take some thing off/from him and hand it off to another guy who slipped it in his pocket.
What was that? The exploded mic?
It certainly was not nothing.
Plus I found a high quality, slow motion, computerized vector-analysis on all the points of his shirt which showed that the blast underneath the shirt propagated from Charlie's right to his left, again pointing to the mic.
I've spent about 27–30 hours of digging in to all the theories on where the gunman was. How many gunman. Where did the shot come from… Etc. etc.
I stayed largely silent on this topic for the last three weeks and I've put in roughly one – four hours daily into careful research.
All that research points definitively at the Mike being the culprit. Nothing else explains the movement of his shirt. I don't even know how many videos I've watched in slow motion of all kinds of bullets hitting ballistics manikins with shirts on to try to duplicate the look. Nothing at all duplicates the movement/look of his shirt. Not even a 50 caliber at close range in any of the videos I've seen made the shirt move even a fraction as much as his moved.
Couple that with the fact that three of his bodyguards immediately crowded around him and removed something. It's indisputable given the high-quality videos that I've seen that they did not take some thing off/from him and hand it off to another guy who slipped it in his pocket.
What was that? The exploded mic?
It certainly was not nothing.
Plus I found a high quality, slow motion, computerized vector-analysis on all the points of his shirt which showed that the blast underneath the shirt propagated from Charlie's right to his left, again pointing to the mic.