It was a federal election, therefore the expectation to ensure election integrity in her role was symbolically seconded to the federal government. The State may, in some cases not work in the interest of the USA. As we know. So, election integrity, and data security are up to the pedes like Tina. So, they SHOULD be making backups of the software before updates, and they SHOULD consult experts if they find something fishy. Oh and if that expert lives in another state? Screw you 'crossed state lines' rule.
The point is: I think someone woke up and realized that a federal election means federally imposed security rules, regarding data-protection. One cannot just trust the election software provider, or the state, it seems. Rottenness everywhere.
I expect Tina to now head a group that will write those election-integrity laws and even processes, when she has been nursed and fed properly.
I trust our POTUS. Maybe he/they found a loophole... 🤔 Note the important word "Full."
It was a federal election, therefore the expectation to ensure election integrity in her role was symbolically seconded to the federal government. The State may, in some cases not work in the interest of the USA. As we know. So, election integrity, and data security are up to the pedes like Tina. So, they SHOULD be making backups of the software before updates, and they SHOULD consult experts if they find something fishy. Oh and if that expert lives in another state? Screw you 'crossed state lines' rule.
The point is: I think someone woke up and realized that a federal election means federally imposed security rules, regarding data-protection. One cannot just trust the election software provider, or the state, it seems. Rottenness everywhere.
I expect Tina to now head a group that will write those election-integrity laws and even processes, when she has been nursed and fed properly.