So I started noticing over the past week or two a sudden increase of posts about Erika Kirk. In my experience this kind of sudden influx of a topic is usually a result of some concerted narrative pushing, so I was curious where this is coming from and more importantly why now.

In finding the answer, I have engaged with many of you Candace-bros, who have been most vocal about this, as always to understand all the facts.

I will first share a small tip in research that has helped me greatly debating on reddit and twitter, but I was able to apply here as well. If you want to learn all about the view point you are debating - say "Global warming" or "Vaccines are safe" you don't have to read every information thats there about it before you can debate. them. That would be a waste of time. Instead, you can outsource the task to your opponents. Challenge them clarify exactly what their strongest position is and to bring you the best evidence for what they are claiming. They will do the research, since they have the motive to you prove you wrong, and you now have something concrete you can work with.

I used the same technique here as well. I wanted to know if I was missing anything of what Candace has been putting out regarding Erika Kirk. And thanks for everyone who played with me, because I got the answer I was looking for.

Sum total of what Candace has been putting forth:

• All the apparent strangeness surrounding the assassination

• That the assassination was part of a conspiracy and not a lone shooter

• That FBI has not been sharing all the information, and instead covering up the assassination

• That Erika has been acting suspiciously - most importantly Not demanding answers from the government and instead attacking those who are demanding answers.

I had no disagreement with the first 3 points - there is definitely more to the assassination, and FBI is definitely not releasing everything they have (whatever the reason may be) just like in the case of "Epstein Files".

As for Erika acting "suspicious", its subjective and not really something I can use to make objective analysis - esp. when you see her on the show with Charlie and the way she acts is very similar to now - like she is an actress. But thats not the point.

Lets for a second assume that her actions are suspicious so that way, I have as much in common with the Candace-bros and we can focus only on the real difference of opinion:

Erika Kirk does not demand that FBI/Government release all the information they have

According to Candace, and all the Candace-bros that engaged with me, this is an absolute sin. Her not "demanding answers" is the biggest problem.

According to this view: Its not enough for us Anons to ask questions. *We have to force everyone else involved to ask the same questions. *

Stay with me - I am now getting to the actual point, it very much concerns this claim.

So many of the comments I received echoed the same thing: "She must ask questions, but she is not"

It is very clear at this point that there is enormous pressure on her to "ask questions" about Charlie Kirk's assassination. No one can deny this - whether you are a Candace-bro or not and whether you agree that she has to ask questions or not - one thing we can all agree is that there is a lot of pressure on Erika to ask questions

What is the purpose of a system? The purpose of a system is what it does. POSIWID

What is the purpose of this whole psyop? To put enormous pressure on Erika to "ask questions".

But why?

So lets do a thought experiment. Assume you are Erika and you decide that you want answers about the assassination of your husband and you publicly demand that FBI/Government provide those answers.

What will be the result of this?

It will damage Trump's DOJ instantly more than anything else. Every MSM and altstream media will run with the headlines

Grieving widow of MAGA's star implies that Trump DOJ is behind his assassination cover up

They will achieve what none of the "Release Epstein Files" or any of the smear jobs about Kash or Pam Bondi failed to do.

Resignation / Firing of people in DOJ who are currently doing exactly what Trump wants them doing.

What is the biggest thing Trump DOJ did recently?

US seizes Iranian oil tanker in ‘illicit shipping network’ off Venezuela coast

Aka, Cutting off one of the last remaining bloodline to the British Banksters - defunding the Narco terrorists.

Yes, this is all about the fight against the British Banksters who are attacking Trump on all fronts and cutting the legs under the Trump DOJ would be a huge win for them.

And that is the goal of this psyop.

And, finally, to wrap this all up neatly, (shout out to all those who reminded me that we have to follow the spouses) who is Candace's husband ?