LOL, his name was not redacted and the link you posted was a filing that actually proves Ransome is not credible when you look at all the emails. From the opening of the document:

The Emails will demonstrate that Ms. Ransome’s inflammatory, salacious, and defamatory testimony concerning the Intervenor and others is false and that the deponent is not credible. Absent this relief, Ms. Ransome’s unrebutted testimony will gravely prejudice Intervenor by publishing deliberate lies calculated to harm his reputation.