This is the correct conclusion. He may have had a knife, maybe a second gun. May have reached for an officers gun. The fact that he purposfully put himself in danger, and especially in a way that was threataning to officers, resisting, etc. It is all on him what happened.
The main point: IT WAS HIS DECISION TO PUT HIMSELF IN A DANGEROUS POSITION. PERIOD. This was easily avoidable.
EVERYONE WITH AN IQ >40 KNOWS COPS CAN AND WILL JUSTIFIABLY DEFEND THEMSELVES, AND IF YOU HAVE ONE OR MORE GUNS AND ACT THE WAY HE DID, IT WILL BE JUSTIFIABLE DEFENCE IF SOMETHING HAPPENS. NO ARGUMENTS. 100% HIS FAULT.
A person must take responsability for their actions, especially if you are gonna insert yourself into a situation like this.
Ultimate definition of FAFO.
No real need for further discussion until definitive facts/footage come in.
This is the correct conclusion. He may have had a knife, maybe a second gun. May have reached for an officers gun. The fact that he purposfully put himself in danger, and especially in a way that was threataning to officers, resisting, etc. It is all on him what happened.
The main point: IT WAS HIS DECISION TO PUT HIMSELF IN A DANGEROUS POSITION. PERIOD. This was easily avoidable. EVERYONE WITH AN IQ >40 KNOWS COPS CAN AND WILL JUSTIFIABLY DEFEND THEMSELVES, AND IF YOU HAVE ONE OR MORE GUNS AND ACT THE WAY HE DID, IT WILL BE JUSTIFIABLE DEFENCE IF SOMETHING HAPPENS. NO ARGUMENTS. 100% HIS FAULT. A person must take responsability for their actions, especially if you are gonna insert yourself into a situation like this.
Ultimate definition of FAFO.
No real need for further discussion until definitive facts/footage come in.