DQ YQU AGREE?
(i.imgflip.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
That would not hold up in court. Did you inspect the whole continent? Maybe they were air-burst.
Ok, now I know you're taking the piss.
Edit: This comment goes to prove my assertion. "There were no nukes because there is no evidence." Logical fallacy.
Then someone would have recorded it and there would be testimonies.
Meaning what? I don't get your weird metaphor.
No, you misunderstood me. There were no nukes. Humans saw clearly that no nukes were dropped on Africa. The evidence it never happened is our eyes and the Africans' eyes seeing an unnuked Africa. And the Africans being alive.
"Taking the piss" is a colloquial term meaning to either mock at the expense of others, or to be joking, without the element of offence; or to be 'unfair' and take more than is warranted.[1] It is a shortening of the idiom taking the piss out of, which is an expression meaning to mock, tease, joke, ridicule, or scoff.[2] Extracting the urine, taking the Mickey (Mickey Bliss, Cockney rhyming slang), taking the Mick or taking the Michael are additional terms for making fun of someone. These terms are most often used in the United Kingdom, Ireland, South Africa, New Zealand, and Australia.
Maybe they were lost. Maybe it happened in an unpopulated area. Maybe witnesses were assassinated by the illumi-naughty. This would not hold up to debate, as we see.
We could do this all day, but I'm afraid I have other plans.
Then by your logic it is impossible to debunk anything or prove anyone wrong.
Is it possible to give evidence that you cannot give evidence that things didn't hapen?
Not at all. For instance, I just proved you wrong using logic and reason, though I'm certain you don't see it that way.
If logic is evidence, and I would argue that it is, I already have.