Our source is an Aussie with a Ukrainian flag in his bio, meaning he's already declared himself as a deep stater supporting the nonsense in Ukraine. Now, he's running the CIA-approved narrative against Tucker within 24 hours of Tucker coming out with a video saying the CIA is spying on him and weaponizing his texts. Now, we're to believe Tucker is a traitor.
Why? "Tucker was talking to the Iranians." And what was he saying, Mr. Bond? No idea? Oh. So Tucker was talking, but you have no idea what he was saying, and the talking alone makes him a traitor you have to remove from the political influence board. Seems legit.
Let's consider an alternate hypothesis. Trump values loyalty. Trump considers Tucker to be in his inner circle and has had Tucker with him in social events and prominently during the campaign. Perhaps talks with Witkoff and Kuschner broke down (Witkoff detailed precisely that on Greta just last week), and Trump sent Tucker in under the guise of setting up an interview, to try a last minute effort? Or perhaps Tucker was talking to dissidents helping set up a new government for Reza Pahlavi who is intended to replace the current regime? We don't know. Again, he was "talking", but no one knows to whom or what was said.
Tucker is a patriot. He has always been. He has 4 or 5 kids. He's a prominent Episcopalian, speaks often about scripture and spiritual matters. He argues that hearing from different perspectives is good journalism (it is) and often calls on people to simply speak the truth. Not "your truth" or "my truth" but "the truth." There's no rational reason to think Tucker would betray his country for of all people, the Iranians. There's no motive to this alleged crime.
The accusation is empty. It's a guilt by association argument meant to be picked up by people who hate Tucker and amplified by idiots who don't read, don't ask questions, and don't think. CIA does this shit all the time. Neocon central wants their war. Tucker has prominently and steadfastly opposed it, so, we get this horse manure.
I'm smelling Steele Dossier 2.0 coming up.
Our source is an Aussie with a Ukrainian flag in his bio, meaning he's already declared himself as a deep stater supporting the nonsense in Ukraine. Now, he's running the CIA-approved narrative against Tucker within 24 hours of Tucker coming out with a video saying the CIA is spying on him and weaponizing his texts. Now, we're to believe Tucker is a traitor.
Why? "Tucker was talking to the Iranians." And what was he saying, Mr. Bond? No idea? Oh. So Tucker was talking, but you have no idea what he was saying, and the talking alone makes him a traitor you have to remove from the political influence board. Seems legit.
Let's consider an alternate hypothesis. Trump values loyalty. Trump considers Tucker to be in his inner circle and has had Tucker with him in social events and prominently during the campaign. Perhaps talks with Witkoff and Kuschner broke down (Witkoff detailed precisely that on Greta just last week), and Trump sent Tucker in under the guise of setting up an interview, to try a last minute effort? Or perhaps Tucker was talking to dissidents helping set up a new government for Reza Pahlavi who is intended to replace the current regime? We don't know. Again, he was "talking", but no one knows to whom or what was said.
Tucker is a patriot. He has always been. He has 4 or 5 kids. He's a prominent Episcopalian, speaks often about scripture and spiritual matters. He argues that hearing from different perspectives is good journalism (it is) and often calls on people to simply speak the truth. Not "your truth" or "my truth" but "the truth." There's no rational reason to think Tucker would betray his country for of all people, the Iranians. There's no motive to this alleged crime.
The accusation is empty. It's a guilt by association argument meant to be picked up by people who hate Tucker and amplified by idiots who don't read, don't ask questions, and don't think. CIA does this shit all the time. Neocon central wants their war. Tucker has prominently and steadfastly opposed it, so, we get this horse manure.
He’s been very vocal about the clearly genocidal actions of “our greatest ally”. This is why he is taking heat now.
The CIA is obviously still a Mossad infected cess pit.