Candace said that it was Andrew who shared the texts with her - said that when she published them.
Factually wrong. When she published them she said its from a trusted source. The next episode - timestamped link she said "Andrew Colvette confirmed that the text messages are real".
See how it works. Same people used as sources and confirmations to make a leak look authentic.
What does it remind you of? C'mon, be honest. We have all lived through this, but when ti was the left doing we had no problem calling them out.
Not really interesting to sit there and say "I am familiar with the texts, but I didn't do anything with the information, because it wasn't a smoking gun
Not sure what you meant by "Not really interesting" - but very relevant. Listen to the exact segment -timestamped. Actually please do listen to that segemnt, its very instructive.
The phrasing of the questions is just so incredibly amazing
"Andrew says he sent the document to someone in the government" - No pause for response.
Now note the next question. Its NOT "Was it you that Andrew sent it to?" but rather
"Did you leak it to Candace?" "No"
"Did you leak it to media?" "No"
"Did you see anyone around you leak it to media?" "I have the same access to media as you all have and I watched it happening but I dont know any specifics of anyone .. leaking ... so yeah"
Anons in the past would know exactly what this meant. Andrew sent it to Joe. Joe let someone else leak it to Candance without knowing the specifics. Megan was given the exact questions to ask so he can answer exactly like this, without technically lying.
If he was actually honest he would have said right after the first sentence "Yeah Andrew sent the screenshots to me, but I told him to make it public himself, not sure what happened after that"
So we have a Rabbi make a wild guess that Joe Kent was the leaker.
We have Andrew confirm that he, surprise surprise, did leak it to Joe Kent, but he does not know what happened after that.
Then we have Joe Kent given a very rehearsed interview, where he was given the exact questions to dodge giving the full answer.
Coincidence?
What was that we Anons used to say about coincidence?
C'mon man, we have cracked far more complex puzzled far few puzzle pieces.
Factually wrong. When she published them she said its from a trusted source. The next episode - timestamped link she said "Andrew Colvette confirmed that the text messages are real".
See how it works. Same people used as sources and confirmations to make a leak look authentic.
What does it remind you of? C'mon, be honest. We have all lived through this, but when ti was the left doing we had no problem calling them out.
Not sure what you meant by "Not really interesting" - but very relevant. Listen to the exact segment -timestamped. Actually please do listen to that segemnt, its very instructive.
The phrasing of the questions is just so incredibly amazing
"Andrew says he sent the document to someone in the government" - No pause for response.
Now note the next question. Its NOT "Was it you that Andrew sent it to?" but rather
"Did you leak it to Candace?" "No"
"Did you leak it to media?" "No"
"Did you see anyone around you leak it to media?" "I have the same access to media as you all have and I watched it happening but I dont know any specifics of anyone .. leaking ... so yeah"
Anons in the past would know exactly what this meant. Andrew sent it to Joe. Joe let someone else leak it to Candance without knowing the specifics. Megan was given the exact questions to ask so he can answer exactly like this, without technically lying.
If he was actually honest he would have said right after the first sentence "Yeah Andrew sent the screenshots to me, but I told him to make it public himself, not sure what happened after that"
So we have a Rabbi make a wild guess that Joe Kent was the leaker.
We have Andrew confirm that he, surprise surprise, did leak it to Joe Kent, but he does not know what happened after that.
Then we have Joe Kent given a very rehearsed interview, where he was given the exact questions to dodge giving the full answer.
Coincidence?
What was that we Anons used to say about coincidence?
C'mon man, we have cracked far more complex puzzled far few puzzle pieces.