Since today is April Fools day is it ok to say that the 1969 moon 'landing' was a psyop?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Really. 40 year old engines? I guess they really did loose all the Saturn tech.
Yeah, the engines were left over. They , NASA , were doing a write up on the progress about 8 years ago and they had a 6' tall man stand in the engine. This was under Senator Nelsons NASA. They were working with a rediculous budget and I noticed they were the 'old' left over engines from the Space Shuttle program that abruptly ended !
" The Artemis program has cost approximately $93 billion from 2012 to 2025, with significant budget overruns attributed to its various components, including the Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft. " from Duck Duck AI.
But you can see they did not have to pay for the engines which would have been at least half the budget. They didn't fly back to the Cape like Space X engines do to be rebuilt. No. I watched them fall back into the ocean as they Chem Trailed the sky. Which is so obscene on its own !
I watched it too and thought it was so retarded compared to what Musk and crew are doing. Literally 80% of that rocket was wasted.
$93 billion and they didn’t even make the engines. They are corrupt thieves. It was a nice touch having a jewish commander. Yet again, they are mocking us.