Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive.
But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.
Maybe the White Hats are monitoring our comments to see how well we see through the crap, which I believe you do very well.
If we 'pass' then we are ready for the next step. When I say we, I'm not just talking about anons, I mean everybody.
Doesn't it seem like we are repeating some things? For instance, we dealt with Biden for four years so we could see how bad things can get. Well, we must not have learned enough because it seems we are repeating it with Mamdani. (We means everyone.)
Election integrity, we just keep going round and round, but still not enough people standing up.
I think this is taking longer than even the White Hats predicted because we were more asleep that they anticipated.
For this particular 'communication', they are hoping enough people say what you just said or at least something like, "This is just a movie, everything is bs.", so we can move forward.
That doesn’t line up with what we've repeatedly been told, though.
If we’re "watching a movie", then everything is already scripted and our role is passive. But if things only happen when people are "ready", then it’s not a movie, it’s dependent on random public behavior.
Same problem with "trust the plan". Either it’s controlled and already set, or it depends on millions of people acting a certain way. It can’t be both. Because you can't have a set plan based on what millions/billions of people might possibly do in the future.
And again, it completely overlooks the fact that "comms" have to be a standardized set of data that all parties know and agree upon, ahead of time. Otherwise, it's just guessing. And based on reading this board for the past 5 years, we don't have the best track record of guessing correctly.
I want to be clear that I 100% believe there is a plan. I simply don't agree with what so many other Anons believe, like all of these "comms" being everywhere. And it's not like Anons can't be wrong about things.
Unfortunately it seems like what the loudest/most agressive/most active Anons say is supposed to set the narrative for what we're all supposed to believe. And if anyone disagrees, then they're called a doomer or shill or retard.
And when those Anons are proven wrong, well, they just pivot, come up with a brand-spanking-new theory to work with and conveniently forgets how very wrong they were the last go around.