I don't know,but I find it very strange that the US MINT has the details of the crime of 1873 on their official website. That's like the CIA having the crime of 1963 on their page,except the mint didn't do it,it was congress and the banks,and rich fuktards.....
The mint was essentially a victim in this 1873 crime, or a NPC, at best. At the time, they shrugged their shoulders and filled the coins-orders as prescribed by the bigwigs. This, to some extent, describes a hierarchical management culture, whereby the workers doff their cap, and the elite have all the control.
Furthermore, the Mint won't lose their position, as a mint, if USA decides to regain its sovereignty and control their own coinage - the old-school way. USA citizens will gain greatly - That is, a range of various metal coins, circulating in the USA, mostly, without being 'infected' by petrodollars and corruption, that is rapid inflation, and constant political ramblings about the 'Middle East'. And did you know that copper and silver are actually good for you, to handle. Copper coins can be nice and big too. Anyhoo,
The dollar problem was exacerbated with that 'genius' banker move back in the seventies, when Vietnam broke the USA (that was because someone was playing the system and becoming fabulously wealthy, but also complete ignorance and buffoonery), and the US economy was in free fall. The dollar was then decoupled from metal. (so that they could go ahead and print money without having to reconcile the notes against bullion stocks - brilliant). LOL. Sound cool, as long as we keep eating and going to work. Right?
But one can't have just paper money, because someone might create that wheelbarrow-ful-of-paper-to-buy-a-loaf-of-bread scenario that happened just in the thirties, and that triggered WW2 in the end, because Germany had inflated themselves to bust.
So the 'dollar' was 'backed by oil' instead of gold, because USA was self-sufficient in terms of oil, right? Only problem: the Middle East had ridiculously easy-to-get oil. It was literally bleeding up in the desert in places. So now, the American tax-payer had to pay massive insurance to London (aha) so that the Moooslims don't cRash the dollarr. The USA taxpayer was a victim to oil-prices and the shenanigans that go on in that market.
Also, if the sovereignty movement happens, there will be a thriving hub of creatives, craftsmen and office administrators employed by the Mint, who will be American patriots. So the Mint have everything to gain by exposing the crime.
On the other hand, CIA was complicit in assissinations-arse. So they have an incentive to keep that on the down-low.
I don't know,but I find it very strange that the US MINT has the details of the crime of 1873 on their official website. That's like the CIA having the crime of 1963 on their page,except the mint didn't do it,it was congress and the banks,and rich fuktards.....
You just explained it perfectly.
The mint was essentially a victim in this 1873 crime, or a NPC, at best. At the time, they shrugged their shoulders and filled the coins-orders as prescribed by the bigwigs. This, to some extent, describes a hierarchical management culture, whereby the workers doff their cap, and the elite have all the control.
Furthermore, the Mint won't lose their position, as a mint, if USA decides to regain its sovereignty and control their own coinage - the old-school way. USA citizens will gain greatly - That is, a range of various metal coins, circulating in the USA, mostly, without being 'infected' by petrodollars and corruption, that is rapid inflation, and constant political ramblings about the 'Middle East'. And did you know that copper and silver are actually good for you, to handle. Copper coins can be nice and big too. Anyhoo,
The dollar problem was exacerbated with that 'genius' banker move back in the seventies, when Vietnam broke the USA (that was because someone was playing the system and becoming fabulously wealthy, but also complete ignorance and buffoonery), and the US economy was in free fall. The dollar was then decoupled from metal. (so that they could go ahead and print money without having to reconcile the notes against bullion stocks - brilliant). LOL. Sound cool, as long as we keep eating and going to work. Right?
But one can't have just paper money, because someone might create that wheelbarrow-ful-of-paper-to-buy-a-loaf-of-bread scenario that happened just in the thirties, and that triggered WW2 in the end, because Germany had inflated themselves to bust.
So the 'dollar' was 'backed by oil' instead of gold, because USA was self-sufficient in terms of oil, right? Only problem: the Middle East had ridiculously easy-to-get oil. It was literally bleeding up in the desert in places. So now, the American tax-payer had to pay massive insurance to London (aha) so that the Moooslims don't cRash the dollarr. The USA taxpayer was a victim to oil-prices and the shenanigans that go on in that market.
Also, if the sovereignty movement happens, there will be a thriving hub of creatives, craftsmen and office administrators employed by the Mint, who will be American patriots. So the Mint have everything to gain by exposing the crime.
On the other hand, CIA was complicit in assissinations-arse. So they have an incentive to keep that on the down-low.
It really devastated small farmers and business. And was a huge issue back in the day. Hopefully us silver stackers get some payback on the bastards.