Trump announces 'blockade' on Strait of Hormuz after Iran talks fail
(www.foxnews.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Not sure if you saw this, you might like it:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASZMLEDCs/trump-on-truththe-trump-card/c/
I have the feeling that having the strait closed suits the US and that they have been arranging it with Iran behind the scenes for geopolitical reasons.
Was listening to a badlands video as I do quite a lot and they were suggesting that JD Vance might be controlled opposition and that the globalists might have been happy for him to take credit for an Iran deal to look like the adult in the room and a safe pair of hands for the next president.
If that were the case, he doesn't seem to have succeeded in his twenty-one hour marathon talks while Trump was at the UFC event like a celeb,
But Trump can sweep the win here by blockading the strait and achieving what JD couldn't, and Trump probably wants the strait blockaded anyway to pressure the Euro globalists.
What do you think of this?
Honestly, what I think is so complex it would be equivalent to a PhD thesis, with too many hypothetical assumptions, as are all thesis, which is why most are bogus. Meaning, without proof.
To assume JD Vance a controlled opposition may be valid if in fact Bibi did call while the meeting was in session. That the statements made, are that JD Vance changed conversation and directives to issues that concern Israel, then indeed this may validate controlled opposition....for Israel.
We won't know the real truth in my life time. They always wait about 20 to 30 years before the "papers" hit the declassification status. Even then, take into consideration the edge of truth, being that it written by man, and man is know to lean if favor of.....(insert word here)
Awesome.
Thanks.
I don't 100% understand Bibi's game.
Sometimes I think Trump has him submission, and that makes a huge amount of sense, but then the Israeli government then go and do something provocative which i think Trump didn't want them to do and that confuses me, unless either Bibi is swapping between his masters depending on who can hurt him most, or that he isn't calling all the shots in Israel.
The fog of war around Bibi's actions is too thick for me to see through, but I feel it is my duty to try anyway.
Trump's interactions with the Israelis is critically important to the plan IMO.
Bibi has only one objective put to him by the puppeteer. It is to expand Israels borders https://mepei.com/greater-israel-an-ongoing-expansion-plan-for-the-middle-east-and-north-africa/
This will put Israel, the evil doer, in total control of middle east oil, transporting it all through Israel as the main corridor pipeline. It will supply Israel a permanent tax or toll on all products, you know, steady income. Being that Israel is nothing more than a welfare parasite and they are seeking the advantage to take control and make the world suffer for fossil fuel as they see fit.
What I meant was, I think Bibi's nuts are in a vice. If he loses power, he could go to prison for some of the things he has done. He has to navigate working towards the eretz israel project and possibly accelerationism towards bringing the Messiah, while also also having to work with Trump who is effectively keeping him in power and protecting him from the even more radical zionists like Ben Gvir for instance. Note that Trump called Bibi a "peacemaker" in front of the knesset. Trump's verbal support helps Bibi stay in position.
Bibi must be sweating. He has to choose whose agenda to work to.
Yup, Bibi has a do or die set forth right now. By Rothschild. Either way, Trump will bail on Bibi at the right time, not leaving Israel vulnerable to invasion, but ridding himself from the clutches of Bibi.
Trump already step on the Roth shoe, threatening to break their container ship insurance scam. This woke Roth up, realized they are not invincible and decided to play nicer with Trump.
So many facets are in play, from all angles. Our one and best objective, IMHO, is to work a deal with Iran, only for the concern of the USA. Then say we're done. Our deal maker line item bonus to Iran would be, cut our deal and we will no longer financially support Israel, we will no longer supply weapons of any kind to Israel, so either Israel settles down and becomes friendly, or take a continuous pounding from Iran until Israel does an unconditional surrender.
I'll have to think about this.
I don't think that the Roths are agreement-capable ( not-agreement-capable is a useful Russian concept)
I dunno. Something has to change within both Iran and Israel. Both have to stop being led by religious fundamentalists. Both effectively have reasonable and unreasonable factions in government and I think the unreasonable factions need to be completely out of power. I don't think this can be done by pounding alone. I'm sure it's in the plan to achieve it, but I'm not sure how it will be done.
And now this, maybe. https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/1ASZMNSWo4/if-this-is-true-big-time-wow--an/c
Should not be too hard. Isn't whatever Iran faction already blockading it?
Until the mines are cleared, no one should traverse the strait.