"Between energy and immigration, they have to straighten themselves out or they're not going to have a Europe anymore!"
"NATO said to me, 'no, we'll send somebody as soon as it's over.' I said, that's not really, you know, we don't NEED THEM! We'll never need them, actually. They'll need us. They need us desperately because they're a paper tiger!" 🔥
"But I've said that. By the way, I've said that for a long time. Before I was in politics, I used to say it."
"I was not in politics, but I sort of enjoyed it and I liked watching things. So I always said they were a paper tiger. Europe has to straighten themselves out!" @RapidResponse47
There is a poster in that thread and his message caught my eye:
Gandalv
@Microinteracti1
3h
Replying to @EricLDaugh
I don’t believe a continent scarred by thousands of wars is soft. They learned a lesson. Europe can wake up any time. 700 million people pissed at the US is not something you want to wish for.
Wondering about that 700 million figure. I guess there are 250 million refugees counted there?
What the fuck are these clown going to do? Row a boat? Because that is what Europe has left if it does not solve the energy issue. And for rowing a boat, you need to be physically strong .... true.
But the weakness is not the experience of war. The weakness is the decadence of a golden cage, turning out to be a golden prison. And as long as the spice flows, nothing will happen.
It almost sounds sarcastic.
Then there is this one:
Minute Man
@Ambisontier
1h
Replying to @EricLDaugh
You should try a real modern war on your own soil, that whipes out 2 generations of your men. I can assure that this will be quite sobering for generations to come. And no, the old Civil War is in no way an argument or even comparable to the 30 year war and WW1 and 2.
O ... poor soul. Such victimhood.
As if the 30 years war between 1618 and 1648 is of any consequence. What this ass hat not seems to comprehend is the reason for war. And that reason has always been connected to a certain group. It starts with what Nicholas de Vere calls: Fake nobility, because it is in actuality a tinkering merchant class. It is a type of feudalism, or if you will: indentured servitude.
And what he certainly not comprehends is the fact that these wars are brought about by ....eh ... a certain moral grammar.
Yes, you read that right: moral grammar. It promotes systemic equivalence, or rather it matters not what you think as long as it ensures this principle, this first salient point: PROFIT and CONTROL.
DONALD TRUMP JUST RIPPED NATO AND EUROPE
"Between energy and immigration, they have to straighten themselves out or they're not going to have a Europe anymore!"
"NATO said to me, 'no, we'll send somebody as soon as it's over.' I said, that's not really, you know, we don't NEED THEM! We'll never need them, actually. They'll need us. They need us desperately because they're a paper tiger!" 🔥
"But I've said that. By the way, I've said that for a long time. Before I was in politics, I used to say it."
"I was not in politics, but I sort of enjoyed it and I liked watching things. So I always said they were a paper tiger. Europe has to straighten themselves out!" @RapidResponse47
Europe needs to wake up and get tough again.
There is a poster in that thread and his message caught my eye:
But the weakness is not the experience of war. The weakness is the decadence of a golden cage, turning out to be a golden prison. And as long as the spice flows, nothing will happen.
It almost sounds sarcastic.
Then there is this one:
O ... poor soul. Such victimhood.
As if the 30 years war between 1618 and 1648 is of any consequence. What this ass hat not seems to comprehend is the reason for war. And that reason has always been connected to a certain group. It starts with what Nicholas de Vere calls: Fake nobility, because it is in actuality a tinkering merchant class. It is a type of feudalism, or if you will: indentured servitude.
And what he certainly not comprehends is the fact that these wars are brought about by ....eh ... a certain moral grammar.
Yes, you read that right: moral grammar. It promotes systemic equivalence, or rather it matters not what you think as long as it ensures this principle, this first salient point: PROFIT and CONTROL.