However, Charlie was assassinated in September and by the end of February we were at war with Iran.

Q1. If Charlie were to, lets assume, strongly come against Feb war, why would he need to be killed considering he would be one amongst many others who survived without getting killed?

Q2: Why such a long delay? Trump managed to change his mind within 3 days before the June strikes, so why kill him 5 months before the Iran war when he could have done the same.

Q3: What did killing Charlie achieve? We still have Tucker/Candace etc changing so many people's minds about Iran, so what did killing Charlie achieve?

This would track as accurate if it were the whole story

There is lot more to the whole story, but let me present it to you purely based on observations related to Charlie, rather than pronouncements of Joe Kent, who has already lied by omission once.

I am judging this situation purely from what can be confirmed regarding Charlie's viewpoints and how it changed.

I am not accepting anything Joe says as full truth, because he already lied by omission once.

So here was a [comment](read this comment) i made recently, putting everything into a timeline and see how it computes

Oh and one thing I am curious about

Okay I am curious about one thing. How do you think whoever killed Charlie find out what he was saying in a private chat with his friends? I really want to know this, but the others never try to reply when I ask this question. I actually have an answer and you would know what it is if you read the link to my comment above.

I hope this helps you see why so many of us believe Charlie was assassinated for his changing views on Israel.

Trust me, I understand far better than what you would expect as to why you all believe this, and I don't mean that in any disrespectful way. I was pretty much where you are with respect to Israel and Jews, and I started going down this path.

So I fully understand why you all believe it.

However, in my case, I did not ignore inconsistencies nor did I hold any specific viewpoint as rigid and unchangable (both regarding Israel and regarding Iran) but rather tried to make sure the overall picture became consistent and thats when I realised I was making assumptions that were not correct.

Thats when I realised that I was suffering from IDS (Israel derangement syndrome) and its the other side of the TDS, and they both take you down the wrong path if you keep ignoring all inconsistencies. TDS was designed to control the left, IDS was designed to control the right.

In anycase, I just like to share my thinking. I don't expect to change anyone's minds. I respect your opinions are different than mine, but I do love to make sure we at least agree on the facts, like when you pointed out I was wrong about what I claimed about Charlie and that lead me dig more and ironically helped me tighten my position when I add it to the rest of the pieces.