Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab - that makes you guys look fucking retarded
If we are going to engage in an info war, you have to battle in truth and you have to choose those battles carefully
All things aside sure even for 50 people its bad - but its IMPOSSiBLE to actually argue that point when people are fixating on an INCORRECT portion of the facts
Its "Van Allen and his campaign spent 7k for an event where they were day drinking" - thats a TRUTHFUL and accurate condemnation. Everyone can be like "ok thats kinda problematic. Shouldnt be day drinking"
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face. You cant condemn behavior that didnt happen. People can simply counter with "thats a lie, there were 50 people there" which is a TRUTHFUL counter. Why give people a good and truthful counter to your criticisms, when you can avoid exaggerating and criticize accurately, leaving no real room for anyone to excuse the behavior?
Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab
Literally no one on this thread is saying that.
Something happened that day, that Kash walked in with the receipts for that specific day. We are just spitballing what it could be and in the process are having insightful discussions here that has become very rare these days.
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face
And I dont say this to disrespect you, but for others following along, this is exactly what "strawman argument" is. Its where condense the entire discussion into one simple point that no one actually made, and then argue against it.
Literally everyone i see is saying that van Allen drank up a 7k bar tab - that makes you guys look fucking retarded
If we are going to engage in an info war, you have to battle in truth and you have to choose those battles carefully
All things aside sure even for 50 people its bad - but its IMPOSSiBLE to actually argue that point when people are fixating on an INCORRECT portion of the facts
Its "Van Allen and his campaign spent 7k for an event where they were day drinking" - thats a TRUTHFUL and accurate condemnation. Everyone can be like "ok thats kinda problematic. Shouldnt be day drinking"
Its not "Van Allen drank a 7k bar tab" - thats a FALSEHOOD that puts you flat on your face. You cant condemn behavior that didnt happen. People can simply counter with "thats a lie, there were 50 people there" which is a TRUTHFUL counter. Why give people a good and truthful counter to your criticisms, when you can avoid exaggerating and criticize accurately, leaving no real room for anyone to excuse the behavior?
I expect more out of this board
Literally no one on this thread is saying that.
Something happened that day, that Kash walked in with the receipts for that specific day. We are just spitballing what it could be and in the process are having insightful discussions here that has become very rare these days.
And I dont say this to disrespect you, but for others following along, this is exactly what "strawman argument" is. Its where condense the entire discussion into one simple point that no one actually made, and then argue against it.