I was hoping he would have won.
Is this a setup to wake people up to the fact that AIPAC controls Congress when they eliminate the one open opponent to their lobby/group of lobbies?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
This is all so confusing and, on the surface, it seems totally contradictory to the plan.
That's exactly why I am asking lol. Wouldn't it be in their best interest to keep someone like that guy in, unless it was intended to wake people up that their representatives don't work for them?
We're in it regardless. If Trump's gone rogue then I guess Q will have to step in some how.
The way I see it, there may be a plan but unless they really do have project looking glass or something similar to not only anticipate but orchestrate events, that plan has to be able to adjust to situations in real-time. Moves and counter moves. It could be that Massie was good for the most part, but as things happen in real time, he could've been compromised recently, or he could could have been no good from the start or just playing a role.
I think the number one thing we need to remember is that Trump's not actually in charge, in that he also is playing a role