The post details President Trump's foreign policy as a full restructuring away from the post-WW2 globalist model where America funded NATO, defended shipping lanes and absorbed trade imbalances. It describes an emerging transactional America First coalition centered on energy, manufacturing and the Abraham Accords framework.
Countries listed include the United States, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Pakistan, Türkiye and India. The analysis projects combined GDP of $65-75 trillion and emphasizes peace through prosperity, reduced military occupations and leverage-based relations with China and Russia instead of permanent escalation.
Who is A J Inapi, and why does his opinion matter? This sounds very plausible and something I've been thinking in the back of my mind for a year or more now, but I haven't heard of this person... does his opinion carry weight?
While I hope this strategy works (oh Lord, do I hope it works!), it seems to have too many moving parts, like a Rube Goldberg drawing, where failure at any point would leave the entire strategy unworkable.
Final thoughts... In the complicated world we live in, where every institution and government is filled with unpredictable and sometimes irrational people, can this plan work? Can Pres. Trump get a partial win and still succeed? And finally, how can we convince younger people and the insane Left of this paradigm shift?
I hope to live long enough to see this through to accomplishment.
The post details President Trump's foreign policy as a full restructuring away from the post-WW2 globalist model where America funded NATO, defended shipping lanes and absorbed trade imbalances. It describes an emerging transactional America First coalition centered on energy, manufacturing and the Abraham Accords framework.
Countries listed include the United States, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Pakistan, Türkiye and India. The analysis projects combined GDP of $65-75 trillion and emphasizes peace through prosperity, reduced military occupations and leverage-based relations with China and Russia instead of permanent escalation.
SOURCE: https://x.com/aj_inapi/status/2059187706995802621 SOURCE (nitter): https://nitter.com/aj_inapi/status/2059187706995802621
Two things occur to me, Catsfive..
Who is A J Inapi, and why does his opinion matter? This sounds very plausible and something I've been thinking in the back of my mind for a year or more now, but I haven't heard of this person... does his opinion carry weight?
While I hope this strategy works (oh Lord, do I hope it works!), it seems to have too many moving parts, like a Rube Goldberg drawing, where failure at any point would leave the entire strategy unworkable.
Final thoughts... In the complicated world we live in, where every institution and government is filled with unpredictable and sometimes irrational people, can this plan work? Can Pres. Trump get a partial win and still succeed? And finally, how can we convince younger people and the insane Left of this paradigm shift?
I hope to live long enough to see this through to accomplishment.
"The old order was based on permanent management of conflict."
"This new model attempts to monetize stability."
That stood out to me as I was reading the piece.