We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.
I'm curious what everyone thinks about this last line? What could it mean to be the public face of Q? Is it truly that or just claiming to be that?
There seem to be a lot of Podcasters that have a far greater reach, and so few people know about this site?
How do you think the Q teams feels about such a strong statement?
Well said..I have wondered how many anons from chans are here as well. I pray they can continue to connect and network.
One thing I have noticed though is many big accout then make these umbrellas where they are simply bringing power from the hands of people in the past, to now the power being theirs. The founders talked and prayed and reflected on this in great detail. As they grow eventually they get corrupt.
So the question becomes how do we build something that unites but also separates power so no one person or small group gets to sway things to much. How do we prevent the mistakes of the past. 20 years from now(I will just use badlands as an example)...let's say they have millions of people listening to them. How do we prevent the corruption that has happened in past. I definitely trust these anons more then the current news, however I know human nature and realize something unique has to happen to really make something lasting.
I believe the founders can offer a roadmap of sorts to help us come together as Individuals(states) but also build and protect each other (federal)
I'm still praying and asking God to give me more revelation on this topic but just kinda sharing my thoughts and the topic I have been reflecting and praying on for 5 years now.
We have the Internet now and I believe that provides a great tool for us to connect as we build community. Cause I the end communities.win
Together through Christ we have endless potential