I haven't seen any. I did try having it summarize a book I wrote. It got many facts completely wrong. I don't see how it got so confused. It also apparently read only the first 100 pages of the book and didn't mention any of the important information contained in the rest of the book. It spent 90% of its time commenting on the introduction of the book.
Is the graphic incorrect? If you are going to reprimand someone for using AI, why not reprimand them for using magic electric boxes instead of hand writing and drawing a cardboard display containing the same information?
Nah, it is way too fuzzy or unclear for it to be Ai. This mees looks like it has been around longer than the constant use of Ai today. But I could be wrong.
"This graphic brought to you by AI."
No, because all the words were spelled correctly. AI graphics mangle spellings like they don't matter.
Not anymore. NotebookLM can create similar graphics without error.
I haven't seen any. I did try having it summarize a book I wrote. It got many facts completely wrong. I don't see how it got so confused. It also apparently read only the first 100 pages of the book and didn't mention any of the important information contained in the rest of the book. It spent 90% of its time commenting on the introduction of the book.
Is the graphic incorrect? If you are going to reprimand someone for using AI, why not reprimand them for using magic electric boxes instead of hand writing and drawing a cardboard display containing the same information?
It's not the accuracy of the graphic, it's the irony that it was done with AI while discussing the skills we are losing to the digital age.
Nah, it is way too fuzzy or unclear for it to be Ai. This mees looks like it has been around longer than the constant use of Ai today. But I could be wrong.