What they are basically saying is that they can gather the data today, which is encrypted with today’s technology and wait until the hardware powerful enough to unencrypt it catches up in the future.
Essentially all privacy will be lost at some point in the future.
All of our encrypted password managers have been sucked up, waiting to be unlocked sometime soon.
What they are basically saying is that they can gather the data today, which is encrypted with today’s technology and wait until the hardware powerful enough to unencrypt it catches up in the future.
Essentially all privacy will be lost at some point in the future.
All of our encrypted password managers have been sucked up, waiting to be unlocked sometime soon.
Meh. The value of such data degrades quickly over time.
E.g., “The allies will invade at Normandy” is only valuable until June 6, 1944. If the Germans cracked that code in September nobody cared.
Why about if you have some verboten antisemitic files or books?
What happens when they pass those laws making that a capital offence, just like jewish run Bolshevik Russia?
This is about data, all data.
Did someone say "verboten"? kek
Yea, it’s a shame we don’t have anything written about ex post facto laws to prevent laws made to “get” political enemies for legal actions.
Or a 2a which would need to go before the F451 firemen come to get your books.
Nonetheless I think they’ll be after our Bibles before your amended copy of the Maus graphic novel.
But what search terms would they use on such a massive data base?
The NSA enters the chat....
Google already does this with reverse image searches.
but the image has to be the same or very close to an image already on-line