Have you ever noticed those that can not argue on facts counter with insults, such as what you just did. I understand every oath I have ever taken! Massie was indeed NOT consistently for the Constitution, the very document I have on my desk and read every week! You are weak, your counter argument is as weak as you are. You argued Massie was a Constitutionalist, he was NOT. I never questioned what you believe in 100% so. Fact check your argument and come back with something valid chief.
You led with "you're weak" and "fact check yourself," so let me put an actual standard on the table instead of trading insults.
My claim was never that Massie voted the way I wanted on every bill. No member does. My claim is that he is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House, and that is metric that is actually measurable.
The groups built to measure fidelity to limited and enumerated government put him at the top. The Republican Liberty Caucus's most recent Liberty Score ranked Massie as the only Republican in the entire House to score 100 or higher. The Club for Growth and Conservative Review run their own scorecards on the same kind of standard, and he rates at or near the top of those as well. That is his recorded voting record measured against constitutional principle, not my opinion.
So here is the fact check, returned. The claim is measurable and the metrics back it. If you have a standard that shows otherwise, name it and post the score. "He wasn't" is not a measure.
And to keep us honest on terms, when I say constitutional I mean voting to keep government inside its delegated powers. If you grade by a broader view of federal authority, you'll score those same votes differently, and then we are arguing definitions, not Massie.
Here is the true issue pal. You can site all of the metrics that show Massie voted for the Constitution. Great. You're correct. The true issue is the clown from Kentucky and his supporters, you the Constitutionalists as you stated must not understand the true enemy and what we are up against. Do you think the Dems, Libs and Deep State follow the Constitution? Do you think your boy Massie knows more about what is going on than TRUMP? Do you believe mASSies voting against TRUMP is the best play to solve all of the issues TRUMP knows about (ie: Deep State) and combat the enemy. Brother, there is only ONE guy that has sacrificed so much of his life and his families life for this nation and that guy is TRUMP! Anyone, like mASSie and those that support him are in the realm of "NORMIE" and are clueless what this movement, what "Q" is all about. "Muh mASSie is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House" Give me a break!
I understand the enemy just fine. However, I also understand that the Constitution is not optional, and even Trump is bound to it. What you seem to be missing is that the enemy can be fought, and defeated, through the Constitution. If anyone violates it, they can be held accountable for that violation. If the courts are corrupted and not enforcing it, then there are other remedies. In the end, if government is operating outside of its charter, the Constitution, then it can be replaced by one that will. That is our natural right, as the founders affirmed in the Declaration of Independence.
Like I said before, I voted for Trump 3 times, but he is not God, not infallible, and is just as subject to the Constitution as any other elected or appointed representative. A President who is doing the work does not need a rubber stamp Congress. He needs members who back him when he is right and tell him the truth when he is not, and the man who is actually correct welcomes that, he does not fear it.
In the end, government answers to us. It is not government's job to police itself and hold itself accountable. That responsibility and power resides with the People. Electing Trump is a good start, but putting it all on him is foolish. Any American who wants to know who is responsible for restoring our Constitutional Republic simply needs to look into a mirror to see who is responsible.
I am not sure why you are acting hostile towards me. We are on the same side, but I also acknowledge the Constitution as inviolable and binding on government in what can or cannot be done.
Have you ever noticed those that can not argue on facts counter with insults, such as what you just did. I understand every oath I have ever taken! Massie was indeed NOT consistently for the Constitution, the very document I have on my desk and read every week! You are weak, your counter argument is as weak as you are. You argued Massie was a Constitutionalist, he was NOT. I never questioned what you believe in 100% so. Fact check your argument and come back with something valid chief.
You led with "you're weak" and "fact check yourself," so let me put an actual standard on the table instead of trading insults.
My claim was never that Massie voted the way I wanted on every bill. No member does. My claim is that he is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House, and that is metric that is actually measurable.
The groups built to measure fidelity to limited and enumerated government put him at the top. The Republican Liberty Caucus's most recent Liberty Score ranked Massie as the only Republican in the entire House to score 100 or higher. The Club for Growth and Conservative Review run their own scorecards on the same kind of standard, and he rates at or near the top of those as well. That is his recorded voting record measured against constitutional principle, not my opinion.
So here is the fact check, returned. The claim is measurable and the metrics back it. If you have a standard that shows otherwise, name it and post the score. "He wasn't" is not a measure.
And to keep us honest on terms, when I say constitutional I mean voting to keep government inside its delegated powers. If you grade by a broader view of federal authority, you'll score those same votes differently, and then we are arguing definitions, not Massie.
Here is the true issue pal. You can site all of the metrics that show Massie voted for the Constitution. Great. You're correct. The true issue is the clown from Kentucky and his supporters, you the Constitutionalists as you stated must not understand the true enemy and what we are up against. Do you think the Dems, Libs and Deep State follow the Constitution? Do you think your boy Massie knows more about what is going on than TRUMP? Do you believe mASSies voting against TRUMP is the best play to solve all of the issues TRUMP knows about (ie: Deep State) and combat the enemy. Brother, there is only ONE guy that has sacrificed so much of his life and his families life for this nation and that guy is TRUMP! Anyone, like mASSie and those that support him are in the realm of "NORMIE" and are clueless what this movement, what "Q" is all about. "Muh mASSie is among the most consistent constitutional voters in the House" Give me a break!
I understand the enemy just fine. However, I also understand that the Constitution is not optional, and even Trump is bound to it. What you seem to be missing is that the enemy can be fought, and defeated, through the Constitution. If anyone violates it, they can be held accountable for that violation. If the courts are corrupted and not enforcing it, then there are other remedies. In the end, if government is operating outside of its charter, the Constitution, then it can be replaced by one that will. That is our natural right, as the founders affirmed in the Declaration of Independence.
Like I said before, I voted for Trump 3 times, but he is not God, not infallible, and is just as subject to the Constitution as any other elected or appointed representative. A President who is doing the work does not need a rubber stamp Congress. He needs members who back him when he is right and tell him the truth when he is not, and the man who is actually correct welcomes that, he does not fear it.
In the end, government answers to us. It is not government's job to police itself and hold itself accountable. That responsibility and power resides with the People. Electing Trump is a good start, but putting it all on him is foolish. Any American who wants to know who is responsible for restoring our Constitutional Republic simply needs to look into a mirror to see who is responsible.
I am not sure why you are acting hostile towards me. We are on the same side, but I also acknowledge the Constitution as inviolable and binding on government in what can or cannot be done.
Well, we are on the same side and just have to agree to disagree on certain matters. Thank you for the discussion! Cheers!