The officers and family need to be criminally charged 100%
And while the murderer absolutely deserves the death penalty, if that was not the law of the land prior, it should only be changed to allow the death penalty for future crimes like this. You should never retroactively change a law to target an individual, no matter how heinous. That's called a bill of attainder and protecting against them is one of America's lesser known Constitutional rights.
No, this is not America, but British fuckery regarding that practice is why it's an inalienable right for the US now. One of the burdens of a lawful society (when it functions properly) is to live under consistent laws that don't change constantly or specifically target individuals.
The officers and family need to be criminally charged 100%
And while the murderer absolutely deserves the death penalty, if that was not the law of the land prior, it should only be changed to allow the death penalty for future crimes like this. You should never retroactively change a law to target an individual, no matter how heinous. That's called a bill of attainder and protecting against them is one of America's lesser known Constitutional rights.
No, this is not America, but British fuckery regarding that practice is why it's an inalienable right for the US now. One of the burdens of a lawful society (when it functions properly) is to live under consistent laws that don't change constantly or specifically target individuals.
live under consistent laws
Can you imagine waking up and there's no sun or snow in the summer? That's what it is.