President Trump announces he's going to send the Iran deal to Congress so Democrats are FORCED to support a NUCLEAR IRAN to the American people..
"The DUMOCRATS would say 'they should have a nuclear weapon!' I like the idea! *Looks at his team* Send it to Congress!" 🔥🔥
(twitter.com)
💥 BOOOOOOM 💥
One thing I find interesting is that Obama was accused of practically committing treason for allowing Iran access to money that critics said would benefit the regime.
Now I'm hearing "it's not taxpayer money" and "it's just sanctions relief" as defenses.
Those sound a lot like the arguments Obama supporters were making a decade ago.
If this deal is better, that's fine. But I think the explanation should be why it's better, not why the old criticisms suddenly don't matter anymore.
Has the Iranian government changed?
So many of the leaders were killed in this conflict, who's in charge these days and what do we know about them?
That's a fair question.
But notice that's a different argument than "it's not taxpayer money" or "it's just sanctions relief."
If the case is that Iran's government is materially different today than it was under the JCPOA, then that's an actual distinction worth discussing.
That's exactly the kind of difference I'm looking for when I ask how this deal differs from Obama's.
What's your opinion? What differences do you see in this regime that contrast the most with the one under Obama?