It doesn't seem so clear to a few of us, the ones whose posts got deleted, and very likely many others so could you take a few moments of your precious time and actually explain what exactly Liz Crokin said or did that now makes her controlled opposition on the topic of Pizzagate?
She first came on my radar because of Jennifer Guskin. Guskin is one of the few survivors of PizzaGate, who (like Guiffre) stuck by Trump when the whole congress and media was gaslighting us with "survivors" who turned out to be victims-turned-perpetrators. She has exposed extensively, her first hand experiences, but she suddenly started getting targeted by the so called PizzaGate advocates including Liz Crokin, who started spreading false rumors that Guskin was accusing Trump of being a pedo, and started taking out restraining orders to stop her from appearing at official hearings etc.
At this point it was very tough to understand why Liz Crokin would sink to this level. I knew that either of the two had to be controlled opposition, until another piece of the puzzle fell in.
"Erika Kirk is involved in the rape, torture & trafficking of children. I came to that conclusion based off my own research & before @RealCandaceO
started exposing this. So everyone who is trying to get me to cover up for this can go fuck off. I don’t care who you are or what you claim to represent — if you are involved in the rape, torture & trafficking of children I will expose you. It’s really that simple."
She has never "exposed" anything about Erika Kirk even though she supposedly did her own research before. This raises a lot of questions. Why did someone who supposedly keeps exposing pedos keep quiet about this for so long?
She never offered any solid evidence or independent evidence that justifies such a solid assertion, and instead all she did was repeating the same "guilty by association to Romanian connection".
This was a good test to figure out which of he two (Crokin or Guskin) were the controlled opposition. If Crokin made a professional expose of Erika Kirk with her independant research, it would have made a compelling case - however, she used her powerful name and reputation to push the same amateur narrative - I was personally very disappointed.
Thats why I said "Its starting to seem like" because anything is, of course, possible. However, right now its looking more like Crokin is the controlled opposition.
It doesn't seem so clear to a few of us, the ones whose posts got deleted, and very likely many others so could you take a few moments of your precious time and actually explain what exactly Liz Crokin said or did that now makes her controlled opposition on the topic of Pizzagate?
She first came on my radar because of Jennifer Guskin. Guskin is one of the few survivors of PizzaGate, who (like Guiffre) stuck by Trump when the whole congress and media was gaslighting us with "survivors" who turned out to be victims-turned-perpetrators. She has exposed extensively, her first hand experiences, but she suddenly started getting targeted by the so called PizzaGate advocates including Liz Crokin, who started spreading false rumors that Guskin was accusing Trump of being a pedo, and started taking out restraining orders to stop her from appearing at official hearings etc.
At this point it was very tough to understand why Liz Crokin would sink to this level. I knew that either of the two had to be controlled opposition, until another piece of the puzzle fell in.
This is what Liz Crokin tweeted at one point:
She has never "exposed" anything about Erika Kirk even though she supposedly did her own research before. This raises a lot of questions. Why did someone who supposedly keeps exposing pedos keep quiet about this for so long?
She never offered any solid evidence or independent evidence that justifies such a solid assertion, and instead all she did was repeating the same "guilty by association to Romanian connection".
This was a good test to figure out which of he two (Crokin or Guskin) were the controlled opposition. If Crokin made a professional expose of Erika Kirk with her independant research, it would have made a compelling case - however, she used her powerful name and reputation to push the same amateur narrative - I was personally very disappointed.
Thats why I said "Its starting to seem like" because anything is, of course, possible. However, right now its looking more like Crokin is the controlled opposition.