I'm shocked that Time is still a going concern. I thought they went under years ago
"Tarika Barrett is the CEO of Girls Who Code" Not to be sexist, but other than a very few yet very notable exceptions, I haven't seen a gal in my entire IT career who could code her way out of a paper bag, so they should be worried about AI considering how low the bar is that they're setting for AI to jump over. Maybe the upcoming generations will be super-girl-boss-coders, but none of them seem to have made it into the workforce yet.
Most of the rest of the article isn't worth the time to comment on. Libtard claptrap that sounds like it was written by a college sophmore in an introduction to writing class.
I'm not sure what the meaning is. The picture seems to be that young persons are annoyed by AI being presented as the panacea for all the world's problems (which it most certainly is not---and maybe even to the contrary). That would be a healthy realism. But the rest of the article degenerates into Do-Goodism.
My thoughts...
I'm shocked that Time is still a going concern. I thought they went under years ago
"Tarika Barrett is the CEO of Girls Who Code" Not to be sexist, but other than a very few yet very notable exceptions, I haven't seen a gal in my entire IT career who could code her way out of a paper bag, so they should be worried about AI considering how low the bar is that they're setting for AI to jump over. Maybe the upcoming generations will be super-girl-boss-coders, but none of them seem to have made it into the workforce yet.
Most of the rest of the article isn't worth the time to comment on. Libtard claptrap that sounds like it was written by a college sophmore in an introduction to writing class.
I'm not sure what the meaning is. The picture seems to be that young persons are annoyed by AI being presented as the panacea for all the world's problems (which it most certainly is not---and maybe even to the contrary). That would be a healthy realism. But the rest of the article degenerates into Do-Goodism.