ALSO… “granting them ‘parole,’ which gives them work permits, which gives them Social Security numbers, which gives them access to the voting booth — and finally hooking them on welfare like Hunter Biden hooked on drugs, all with the sole purpose of participating in U.S. elections and ultimately overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”
Fraudulent Visa abuse is another avenue of foreign invasion and illegal anchor baby citizenship to supplant Americans on our own soil, while also stealing our jobs, etc.
The H-1B and student visa abuse problem is about visa fraud, labor-market abuse, weak enforcement, corporate conflicts of interest, displacement of American workers, loss of control inside American companies, and the long-term consequences of letting temporary foreign-worker pipelines become backdoor immigration systems.
H-1B was supposed to be limited to legitimate specialty occupations. The job itself must require specialized theoretical and practical knowledge and a directly related degree or equivalent. It is not enough that the employer is a technology company. It is not enough that the applicant has a degree. It is not enough that the company prefers a foreign worker. The role itself must lawfully qualify.
That is where much of the abuse is happening. Companies are using H-1B and related visa pipelines for jobs that often are not legitimate H-1B specialty occupations at all. These include routine technical support, customer support, customer success, help desk, support operations, QA, project coordination, business operations, generic IT, and support management roles.
Those may be real jobs, but many are not lawful H-1B roles. A customer support role does not become a specialty occupation merely because the product is technical. A tech support role does not become H-1B-eligible merely because the worker uses cloud dashboards, ticketing systems, escalation procedures, internal tools, or product documentation. A manager role does not become a specialty occupation merely because the manager supervises technical employees.
The legal question should be simple: does the actual job require specialized knowledge in a specific field, and does it normally require a directly related bachelor’s degree or equivalent? If the answer is no, the role should not qualify.
This is how role misclassification works. Companies can inflate ordinary roles with technical-sounding titles, vague degree language, copied job descriptions, and artificial specialty requirements. They can classify routine support, customer success, project, analyst, operations, or management work under a computer-related category even when the actual work is not truly a specialty occupation.
Federal audits should compare the petition against the real job. Investigators should review the internal job description, org chart, ticket queues, actual duties, performance goals, required degree field, wage level, rejected American applicants, and whether American employees perform the same work without a specialized degree.
The labor-shortage claim also needs serious scrutiny. In many of these roles, qualified Americans exist. American citizens, lawful permanent residents, veterans, recent graduates, laid-off technology workers, experienced support professionals, engineers, analysts, and managers are available for much of the work now being routed into foreign-worker pipelines.
The current system fails American workers because many employers are not required to prove they seriously recruited Americans first. That means a company can claim a need for foreign labor without first proving that qualified U.S. workers were unavailable. That is backwards. If a company wants permission to import labor for a U.S. job, the burden should be on the company to prove the role is legally eligible, the duties are genuinely specialized, the wage is not suppressing the market, and qualified American workers were not bypassed.
The abuse is broader than H-1B. Student visa pathways are also part of the problem. F-1, CPT, OPT, and STEM OPT can create a pipeline where foreign students take university seats, obtain U.S. internships, move into post-graduation work authorization, and then transition into H-1B sponsorship. When everything is lawful and honest, that is one issue. When the pipeline uses fake employers, shell companies, false training plans, ghost offices, sham documentation, weak verification, or fraudulent credentials, it becomes a backdoor labor system.
This affects American students and graduates directly. Non-citizens can take limited university seats, compete for limited internships, obtain work authorization through student programs, and then be converted into longer-term employment pipelines. Meanwhile, American students and recent graduates are competing for the same internships, entry-level jobs, and early-career opportunities.
Recent fake-degree reporting connected to foreign credential networks is a warning sign. Reports have described massive numbers of counterfeit academic documents and alleged links to visa concerns. That does not mean every foreign applicant is fraudulent, and it should not be used as an ethnic accusation. But it does show why credential verification, degree authentication, employer verification, and petition audits must become much stricter.
There are also serious allegations from former officials that fraud rates in some H-1B processing environments were extremely high. Those allegations should not be overstated into a claim that every petition is fraudulent. But combined with DOJ prosecutions, USCIS fraud investigations, fake-degree networks, ghost-office employers, and student visa abuse cases, they justify a serious federal investigation into the full visa pipeline.
The upper-management problem is also real. When large numbers of visa-sponsored or non-citizen workers move into manager, director, executive, recruiting, HR, workforce-planning, vendor-management, or sponsorship-approval roles, they can influence who gets hired, who gets promoted, which roles are sponsored, which American workers are rejected, and which foreign-worker pipelines keep expanding.
A non-citizen manager is not automatically acting unlawfully. But companies should not be allowed to build closed-loop visa pipelines where foreign-national managers, staffing vendors, immigration teams, and executive sponsors repeatedly approve more foreign-worker hiring without independent U.S.-worker impact review. it is a real conflict of interest, and should be flagged as violations of the ethics rules most major American employers set as mandatory required annual training for all employee's.
At that point, the concern is no longer just individual visa fraud. It becomes a corporate-control problem. American companies can gradually become dependent on non-citizen labor pipelines, non-citizen management chains, offshore vendor relationships, and internal sponsorship networks that make it harder for American workers to enter, advance, or regain control of critical U.S. business functions.
There is also a data-security and national-security issue. Not all company data is limited to U.S. citizens, but some government, defense, export-controlled, cloud, regulated, contractual, or customer-restricted data may require U.S. persons, U.S. citizens, cleared personnel, or workers physically located on American soil. If foreign nationals are given access to data that is legally or contractually restricted, that is not merely an immigration issue. It becomes a security, export-control, federal-contracting, and customer-trust issue.
The secondary fallout is real. When temporary visa programs are abused at scale, the consequences do not stop with the job opening. These programs bring large numbers of non-citizens into the United States through work, student, internship, and employment pathways that were supposed to be lawful, limited, temporary, and carefully controlled. If those pathways are built on fake degrees, sham employers, misclassified jobs, ghost offices, false petitions, or roles that do not qualify under H-1B law, then the downstream consequences are part of the abuse. That includes pressure on American workers, American students, university seats, internships, entry-level jobs, housing, wages, schools, local communities, and long-term citizenship policy.
The 14th Amendment issue should also be addressed directly. The Citizenship Clause does not say that every person born on American soil is automatically a citizen. It says a person must be born or naturalized in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Those words cannot be treated as meaningless. They require more than physical presence. Current court precedent has read birthright citizenship broadly, but that interpretation should be revisited. Lawful presence is not citizenship. A temporary visa holder, student visa holder, guest worker, tourist, unlawful entrant, or other non-citizen remains a national or subject of a foreign country and retains foreign allegiance. Temporary submission to U.S. law is not the same thing as permanent allegiance to the United States.
Birth on U.S. soil alone should not be enough. At least one parent should be a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, or otherwise in a status reflecting genuine, lawful, permanent allegiance to the United States. Temporary visa holders, unlawful entrants, fraudulent visa holders, and people present under bad-faith or non-permanent arrangements should not be able to create automatic citizenship by childbirth. The government should not allow birth tourism, visa fraud, sham employment, fake student status, unlawful entry, or temporary labor pipelines to become backdoor citizenship mechanisms.
The original purpose of the 14th Amendment was to secure citizenship for freed slaves and those truly subject to American jurisdiction, not to create a global birthright incentive for foreign nationals with no permanent allegiance to the United States. Congress and the courts should restore the Citizenship Clause to its proper meaning: birth, plus true jurisdiction, plus allegiance. The Visa immigration fraud turns into another avenue of foreign invasion on our Republic and our Constitution.
Where there is knowing fraud, false statements, forged documents, sham jobs, conspiracy, or intentional misuse of the visa system, criminal prosecution should be on the table. Where the violation is administrative or civil, the remedies should still be serious: denial, revocation, debarment, back-wage liability, penalties, compliance monitoring, and mandatory review of affected American workers.
Congress and federal agencies should investigate the full chain: foreign academic credential verification, F-1 admissions, CPT internships, OPT and STEM OPT employment, direct conversion from student work programs into H-1B, H-1B staffing firms, ghost-office employers, sham companies, low-wage job classifications, H-1B-dependent employers, corporate managers involved in repeat sponsorship decisions, and access to restricted U.S. data.
The remedy is enforcement. Audit the employers. Verify the degrees. Inspect the worksites. Review the wage levels. Investigate the shell companies. Penalize false petitions. Debar repeat offenders. Prosecute fraud. Protect American students, American graduates, American workers, American companies, and restricted American data.
Lawful immigration is one issue. Visa fraud, role misclassification, labor-market manipulation, corporate capture, unlawful access to restricted data, and backdoor citizenship consequences are another. The United States has every right to enforce the difference.
I worked in healthcare. Foreigners came in on visas to become doctors and the agreement that time was they were supposed to return home to provide medical care for their own. Guess what, nobody returned home.
ALSO… “granting them ‘parole,’ which gives them work permits, which gives them Social Security numbers, which gives them access to the voting booth — and finally hooking them on welfare like Hunter Biden hooked on drugs, all with the sole purpose of participating in U.S. elections and ultimately overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”
The whole f**king is seditious,
Fraudulent Visa abuse is another avenue of foreign invasion and illegal anchor baby citizenship to supplant Americans on our own soil, while also stealing our jobs, etc.
The H-1B and student visa abuse problem is about visa fraud, labor-market abuse, weak enforcement, corporate conflicts of interest, displacement of American workers, loss of control inside American companies, and the long-term consequences of letting temporary foreign-worker pipelines become backdoor immigration systems.
H-1B was supposed to be limited to legitimate specialty occupations. The job itself must require specialized theoretical and practical knowledge and a directly related degree or equivalent. It is not enough that the employer is a technology company. It is not enough that the applicant has a degree. It is not enough that the company prefers a foreign worker. The role itself must lawfully qualify.
That is where much of the abuse is happening. Companies are using H-1B and related visa pipelines for jobs that often are not legitimate H-1B specialty occupations at all. These include routine technical support, customer support, customer success, help desk, support operations, QA, project coordination, business operations, generic IT, and support management roles.
Those may be real jobs, but many are not lawful H-1B roles. A customer support role does not become a specialty occupation merely because the product is technical. A tech support role does not become H-1B-eligible merely because the worker uses cloud dashboards, ticketing systems, escalation procedures, internal tools, or product documentation. A manager role does not become a specialty occupation merely because the manager supervises technical employees.
The legal question should be simple: does the actual job require specialized knowledge in a specific field, and does it normally require a directly related bachelor’s degree or equivalent? If the answer is no, the role should not qualify.
This is how role misclassification works. Companies can inflate ordinary roles with technical-sounding titles, vague degree language, copied job descriptions, and artificial specialty requirements. They can classify routine support, customer success, project, analyst, operations, or management work under a computer-related category even when the actual work is not truly a specialty occupation.
Federal audits should compare the petition against the real job. Investigators should review the internal job description, org chart, ticket queues, actual duties, performance goals, required degree field, wage level, rejected American applicants, and whether American employees perform the same work without a specialized degree.
The labor-shortage claim also needs serious scrutiny. In many of these roles, qualified Americans exist. American citizens, lawful permanent residents, veterans, recent graduates, laid-off technology workers, experienced support professionals, engineers, analysts, and managers are available for much of the work now being routed into foreign-worker pipelines.
The current system fails American workers because many employers are not required to prove they seriously recruited Americans first. That means a company can claim a need for foreign labor without first proving that qualified U.S. workers were unavailable. That is backwards. If a company wants permission to import labor for a U.S. job, the burden should be on the company to prove the role is legally eligible, the duties are genuinely specialized, the wage is not suppressing the market, and qualified American workers were not bypassed.
The abuse is broader than H-1B. Student visa pathways are also part of the problem. F-1, CPT, OPT, and STEM OPT can create a pipeline where foreign students take university seats, obtain U.S. internships, move into post-graduation work authorization, and then transition into H-1B sponsorship. When everything is lawful and honest, that is one issue. When the pipeline uses fake employers, shell companies, false training plans, ghost offices, sham documentation, weak verification, or fraudulent credentials, it becomes a backdoor labor system.
This affects American students and graduates directly. Non-citizens can take limited university seats, compete for limited internships, obtain work authorization through student programs, and then be converted into longer-term employment pipelines. Meanwhile, American students and recent graduates are competing for the same internships, entry-level jobs, and early-career opportunities.
Recent fake-degree reporting connected to foreign credential networks is a warning sign. Reports have described massive numbers of counterfeit academic documents and alleged links to visa concerns. That does not mean every foreign applicant is fraudulent, and it should not be used as an ethnic accusation. But it does show why credential verification, degree authentication, employer verification, and petition audits must become much stricter.
There are also serious allegations from former officials that fraud rates in some H-1B processing environments were extremely high. Those allegations should not be overstated into a claim that every petition is fraudulent. But combined with DOJ prosecutions, USCIS fraud investigations, fake-degree networks, ghost-office employers, and student visa abuse cases, they justify a serious federal investigation into the full visa pipeline.
The upper-management problem is also real. When large numbers of visa-sponsored or non-citizen workers move into manager, director, executive, recruiting, HR, workforce-planning, vendor-management, or sponsorship-approval roles, they can influence who gets hired, who gets promoted, which roles are sponsored, which American workers are rejected, and which foreign-worker pipelines keep expanding.
A non-citizen manager is not automatically acting unlawfully. But companies should not be allowed to build closed-loop visa pipelines where foreign-national managers, staffing vendors, immigration teams, and executive sponsors repeatedly approve more foreign-worker hiring without independent U.S.-worker impact review. it is a real conflict of interest, and should be flagged as violations of the ethics rules most major American employers set as mandatory required annual training for all employee's.
At that point, the concern is no longer just individual visa fraud. It becomes a corporate-control problem. American companies can gradually become dependent on non-citizen labor pipelines, non-citizen management chains, offshore vendor relationships, and internal sponsorship networks that make it harder for American workers to enter, advance, or regain control of critical U.S. business functions.
There is also a data-security and national-security issue. Not all company data is limited to U.S. citizens, but some government, defense, export-controlled, cloud, regulated, contractual, or customer-restricted data may require U.S. persons, U.S. citizens, cleared personnel, or workers physically located on American soil. If foreign nationals are given access to data that is legally or contractually restricted, that is not merely an immigration issue. It becomes a security, export-control, federal-contracting, and customer-trust issue.
The secondary fallout is real. When temporary visa programs are abused at scale, the consequences do not stop with the job opening. These programs bring large numbers of non-citizens into the United States through work, student, internship, and employment pathways that were supposed to be lawful, limited, temporary, and carefully controlled. If those pathways are built on fake degrees, sham employers, misclassified jobs, ghost offices, false petitions, or roles that do not qualify under H-1B law, then the downstream consequences are part of the abuse. That includes pressure on American workers, American students, university seats, internships, entry-level jobs, housing, wages, schools, local communities, and long-term citizenship policy.
The 14th Amendment issue should also be addressed directly. The Citizenship Clause does not say that every person born on American soil is automatically a citizen. It says a person must be born or naturalized in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Those words cannot be treated as meaningless. They require more than physical presence. Current court precedent has read birthright citizenship broadly, but that interpretation should be revisited. Lawful presence is not citizenship. A temporary visa holder, student visa holder, guest worker, tourist, unlawful entrant, or other non-citizen remains a national or subject of a foreign country and retains foreign allegiance. Temporary submission to U.S. law is not the same thing as permanent allegiance to the United States.
Birth on U.S. soil alone should not be enough. At least one parent should be a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, or otherwise in a status reflecting genuine, lawful, permanent allegiance to the United States. Temporary visa holders, unlawful entrants, fraudulent visa holders, and people present under bad-faith or non-permanent arrangements should not be able to create automatic citizenship by childbirth. The government should not allow birth tourism, visa fraud, sham employment, fake student status, unlawful entry, or temporary labor pipelines to become backdoor citizenship mechanisms.
The original purpose of the 14th Amendment was to secure citizenship for freed slaves and those truly subject to American jurisdiction, not to create a global birthright incentive for foreign nationals with no permanent allegiance to the United States. Congress and the courts should restore the Citizenship Clause to its proper meaning: birth, plus true jurisdiction, plus allegiance. The Visa immigration fraud turns into another avenue of foreign invasion on our Republic and our Constitution.
Where there is knowing fraud, false statements, forged documents, sham jobs, conspiracy, or intentional misuse of the visa system, criminal prosecution should be on the table. Where the violation is administrative or civil, the remedies should still be serious: denial, revocation, debarment, back-wage liability, penalties, compliance monitoring, and mandatory review of affected American workers.
Congress and federal agencies should investigate the full chain: foreign academic credential verification, F-1 admissions, CPT internships, OPT and STEM OPT employment, direct conversion from student work programs into H-1B, H-1B staffing firms, ghost-office employers, sham companies, low-wage job classifications, H-1B-dependent employers, corporate managers involved in repeat sponsorship decisions, and access to restricted U.S. data.
The remedy is enforcement. Audit the employers. Verify the degrees. Inspect the worksites. Review the wage levels. Investigate the shell companies. Penalize false petitions. Debar repeat offenders. Prosecute fraud. Protect American students, American graduates, American workers, American companies, and restricted American data.
Lawful immigration is one issue. Visa fraud, role misclassification, labor-market manipulation, corporate capture, unlawful access to restricted data, and backdoor citizenship consequences are another. The United States has every right to enforce the difference.
I worked in healthcare. Foreigners came in on visas to become doctors and the agreement that time was they were supposed to return home to provide medical care for their own. Guess what, nobody returned home.
But I thought it was a movie....
huh