Stephen Miller ON the Supreme Court allowing birthright citizenship for illegal aliens..
"Some of the justices think they're SO INTELLIGENT — there is NO POSSIBLE READING of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, citizenship, and obligations, foreign EVERYTHING”🔥
(twitter.com)
- FIRE AND TRUTH SALT -
He Accurately Further States:: The idea that you can have a cruise ship FILLED with foreigners and they just dock at a port for an hour and someone has a baby,, the baby is an American citizen!"
"They can vote in every election for the rest of their lives. They can be living in a foreign country and cashing welfare checks from American citizens."
"We have people from all over the world, from third world nations, nations that on their own would have never invented the wheel, let alone modern technology, let alone medicine, let alone air travel. And they can just come into the country, have a baby at a hospital paid for it by you and me!"
"And then that baby is automatically a citizen that baby can sit on a jury when he turns 18 and sit in judgment of you and sit in judgment of me and sit in judgment of our loved ones can decide who our mayors are, our governors are, our presidents are."
"Citizenship means nothing if it is open to everyone."
🔥🔥🔥
Shoot, they could BE president!
impeachment time for Chief Justice Roberts, hope hearings start the day after the Midterms, or sooner, Amy “Comey” Barrett
Let’s just remove the 14th amendment, problem solved
Just like liberals want to just remove the 2nd Amendment. Let's not go down that road and give them a handy dandy precdent to use.
Ok. Enjoy learning chinese
It's absolutely unrealistic and opens up too many cans of worms with unintended consequences.
"just remove it" doesn't work for Constitutional amemdments. It's just a knee jerk reaction to make you feel better about what is going on.
Not being able to bear arms, because liberals used the same tactics of just removing amendments they don't like, is more likely to have us eventually speaking Chinese here.
The 14th isn't only about citizenship by birth. There's also the bit in there about due process. You know about that, right? How it keeps the government from just confiscating all of our property, weaponizing the judical system (even more), mass arrests, etc?
Not only would just yanking the 14th kneecap us, going around talking about just eliminating amendments we don't like gives massive ammuniton against us with the 2nd. We can't yell about the Constitution being sacred and "shall not be infringed!" out of one side of our mouth and then yell for eliminating amendments we don't like out of the other.
And then of course comes the practicality of the legal reality. If we had the votes to LEGALLY eliminate the amendment, then we would have the votes to fix just the part about the citizenship clause WITHOUT gutting the rest of it.
So while it might make you FEEL better to say it and fantasize about it happening, there are real world consequences for doing so that you're not taking into consideration
Then add one to clarify or cancel. The amendment had a purpose that’s is no longer relevant, it has to be fixed, because it is a problem now
Then that's an entirely different thing.
The end result is the same, there are a couple ways to get there.
The 14th would be abolished. It’s the root of this citizenship issue.
No, the 14th amendment would not be abolished if one aspect of it was changed, because there is more to it than just birthright citizenship. I already pointed out some of those to you earlier.
It's like saying the entire First Amendment would be abolished if the US ruled that Islam wasn't a religion and wasn't covered under the freedom of religion part of the First Amendment.
I'm not sure what it is you're having trouble with on all this. Amendments frequently have multiple, separate provisions. Changing one provision in an Amendment wouldn't just abolish everything else in it
It's interesting how closely this parrots what liberals say about the 2nd Amendment.
It was needed when we were a frontier nation with no standing army. But now it enables mass shootings, daily gun violence, and weapons the Founders couldn't even have imagined when they created it.
So outdated + causing problems = repeal or rewrite.
That perfectly aligns with what liberals say about the 2nd Amendment
So how exactly did that happen anyway?
If those "citizens" aren't filing tax returns.....why are the rest of us doing so anyway?
What makes you think they don't file tax returns?