interesting dig! hoping the House of Rep. committee on the Judiciary picks up on this, & other matters, getting a correct definition of Citizenship bill passed
It is not a "bombshell" new scandal in the sense of fresh revelations—much of the underlying information dates to 2023 reporting triggered by a whistleblower. The complaint amplifies and frames those details as ethics violations warranting disbarment.
snopes.com
Core Allegations Jane Roberts' earnings: While working as a legal recruiter at Major, Lindsey & Africa (2007–2014), she earned $10.3 million in commissions (from ~$13.3 million in attributed revenue), per internal firm spreadsheets released by whistleblower Kendal Price (a former colleague). She placed lawyers at prominent firms (e.g., WilmerHale, Hogan Lovells) that later argued cases before the Supreme Court. She later joined Macrae.
businessinsider.com
Disclosure issues: On federal financial disclosure forms (required under the Ethics in Government Act), John Roberts reportedly listed her income as "salary" for many years rather than commissions. He amended some forms in 2023 after media reports. An equity stake in Macrae (valued $100K–$250K) was omitted for three years (later called "inadvertence"). Armitage estimates total household income from such sources at ~$20–22 million by extrapolating later years.
medium.com
Recusal failures: Roberts allegedly did not recuse himself in hundreds of cases involving firms that paid his household via his wife's work, potentially violating 28 U.S.C. § 455 (judge must disqualify if impartiality might reasonably be questioned or if spouse has a financial interest that could be affected).
cmarmitage.substack.com
Broader claims: Violations of D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit), plus references to false statements statutes.
The complaint cites ethics analyses (e.g., from Prof. Bennett Gershman) and invites others to file similar complaints with the D.C. Bar.
medium.com
Context and StatusOrigins: The $10.3M figure and commission details became public in 2023 via Business Insider, NYT, Politico, and Price's whistleblower filing to Congress. Supreme Court spokespeople have noted Roberts consulted ethics guidance and saw no need for routine recusals, citing advisory opinions on spousal recruiting work.
snopes.com
As of mid-2026: The D.C. Bar has the complaint under review (or has declined deep investigation per some reports). Disbarment would be largely symbolic—it wouldn't remove Roberts from the Supreme Court (which requires impeachment by Congress, not bar membership). No indication of formal charges, hearing, or outcome yet.
facebook.com
Counterpoints: Disclosure laws require reporting spousal income sources above certain thresholds but not always exact amounts or structures in detail. Critics argue the arrangement creates an appearance of conflict; defenders say it's legal, disclosed at the source level, and doesn't automatically require recusal under existing guidance. The $20M+ total includes unverified estimates for post-2014 earnings.
While the media remains silent, Neil Johnson says he's digging into the receipts that show how Roberts may have betrayed the Constitution to serve institutional interests.
In this video, I break down the shocking connection between these payments and a controversial 14th Amendment ruling that effectively rewrites American citizenship. Roberts and Barrett didn’t just miss the point—they’ve handed the keys to the country to anyone who crosses the border, ignoring the original intent of the framers.
We’re exposing the corruption trail, from secret FISA court appointments to the millions in "commissions" funneled through elite law firms. But we aren't just complaining; I’m revealing the "Rebellion Playbook" that states can use right now to nullify this judicial coup and protect our republic.
In this video, you’ll discover:
The truth behind the $20,000,000 Roberts scandal and the disbarment filing.
How the 14th Amendment was hijacked to create a "feudal" version of citizenship.
The "Anchors Away Act" and how states can stop issuing birth certificates to illegal entrants.
Why the "jus soli" doctrine is a tool for kings, not a free Republic.
The America you know is at a breaking point. It’s time to demand the Constitution means what it says.
Link To Article - https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/20728587... >
interesting dig! hoping the House of Rep. committee on the Judiciary picks up on this, & other matters, getting a correct definition of Citizenship bill passed
It is not a "bombshell" new scandal in the sense of fresh revelations—much of the underlying information dates to 2023 reporting triggered by a whistleblower. The complaint amplifies and frames those details as ethics violations warranting disbarment.
snopes.com
Core Allegations Jane Roberts' earnings: While working as a legal recruiter at Major, Lindsey & Africa (2007–2014), she earned $10.3 million in commissions (from ~$13.3 million in attributed revenue), per internal firm spreadsheets released by whistleblower Kendal Price (a former colleague). She placed lawyers at prominent firms (e.g., WilmerHale, Hogan Lovells) that later argued cases before the Supreme Court. She later joined Macrae.
businessinsider.com
Disclosure issues: On federal financial disclosure forms (required under the Ethics in Government Act), John Roberts reportedly listed her income as "salary" for many years rather than commissions. He amended some forms in 2023 after media reports. An equity stake in Macrae (valued $100K–$250K) was omitted for three years (later called "inadvertence"). Armitage estimates total household income from such sources at ~$20–22 million by extrapolating later years.
medium.com
Recusal failures: Roberts allegedly did not recuse himself in hundreds of cases involving firms that paid his household via his wife's work, potentially violating 28 U.S.C. § 455 (judge must disqualify if impartiality might reasonably be questioned or if spouse has a financial interest that could be affected).
cmarmitage.substack.com
Broader claims: Violations of D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit), plus references to false statements statutes.
The complaint cites ethics analyses (e.g., from Prof. Bennett Gershman) and invites others to file similar complaints with the D.C. Bar.
medium.com
Context and StatusOrigins: The $10.3M figure and commission details became public in 2023 via Business Insider, NYT, Politico, and Price's whistleblower filing to Congress. Supreme Court spokespeople have noted Roberts consulted ethics guidance and saw no need for routine recusals, citing advisory opinions on spousal recruiting work.
snopes.com
As of mid-2026: The D.C. Bar has the complaint under review (or has declined deep investigation per some reports). Disbarment would be largely symbolic—it wouldn't remove Roberts from the Supreme Court (which requires impeachment by Congress, not bar membership). No indication of formal charges, hearing, or outcome yet.
facebook.com
Counterpoints: Disclosure laws require reporting spousal income sources above certain thresholds but not always exact amounts or structures in detail. Critics argue the arrangement creates an appearance of conflict; defenders say it's legal, disclosed at the source level, and doesn't automatically require recusal under existing guidance. The $20M+ total includes unverified estimates for post-2014 earnings.
snopes.com
Roberts CAUGHT in $20,000,000 Scandal!!
While the media remains silent, Neil Johnson says he's digging into the receipts that show how Roberts may have betrayed the Constitution to serve institutional interests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7abLsPV-nU