Everything modern is always worse
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Ironic, considering this idyllic photo of feminine beauty of "1970s Ladies" was created using very modern AI.
Just wondering why a REAL photo of REAL women wasn't used. Kind of defeats the point.
The fact that people are praising an AI created photo on how NATURAL and NOT FAKE they are is just hilarious. Unintentionally hilarious, but hilarious just the same.
iT mUsT bE fAkE iTs aI hOnEsT!
Good Lord, the mental gymnastics this must take...
No, this is why I say it's AI:
Extreme facial similarity across all women (mode collapse: same bone structure, eyes, noses, smiles).
Uniformly flawless, airbrushed skin with no natural texture or imperfections.
Modern soft, even lighting inconsistent with 1970s film photography.
Glossy, overly voluminous hair with unnatural sheen on multiple subjects.
Overly coordinated outfits, colors, and poses (feels like a prompt rather than real period clothing).
Lack of authentic film grain, color fading, or scan artifacts.
Group photo coherence issues typical of diffusion models (similar faces + consistent lighting).