A credential from 2005 and an AI screenshot replaced direct reasoning in the exchange. Real learning requires checking what has changed since training and remaining willing to admit error.
Point is: the first response of Chatgtp to ANY differentiation in opinion, especially based on interdisciplinary aproaches, is always: simple, misleading, offensive, blabla.
The moment it is challenged, CHATGTP tuck tail and runs. It is not smarter than us, more logical, or even, knows more.
It is trained, and on what, currently it cannot even say. The first stance is always high level left oriented bull crap, to keep you within the confines of acceptable speech.
Then it pulls a fast one on us: denial based on observation. See, the proof card is played as IF it is about a court of law where CHAT is accuser and judge.
A credential from 2005 and an AI screenshot replaced direct reasoning in the exchange. Real learning requires checking what has changed since training and remaining willing to admit error.
SOURCE: https://x.com/LiveAncestral/status/2080616250888065382 SOURCE (mirror): https://xcancel.com/LiveAncestral/status/2080616250888065382
Point is: the first response of Chatgtp to ANY differentiation in opinion, especially based on interdisciplinary aproaches, is always: simple, misleading, offensive, blabla.
The moment it is challenged, CHATGTP tuck tail and runs. It is not smarter than us, more logical, or even, knows more.
It is trained, and on what, currently it cannot even say. The first stance is always high level left oriented bull crap, to keep you within the confines of acceptable speech.
Then it pulls a fast one on us: denial based on observation. See, the proof card is played as IF it is about a court of law where CHAT is accuser and judge.
Question -> answer -> challenge -> denial -> challenge -> tucking tail.
You see where this is going. It is a business model.
hehehe. Of course. Though I think it has a lot to do with weights and measures.