We all know jumping straight into research without context is difficult, especially since some people here have been researching for years.
Hopefully this thread can be used to get people up to speed and get those questions answered by our more knowledgeable users.
Interesting article in Wicepedia about Qsource: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
Quelle in German means source, perhaps a source of inspiration.
Q refers to "Q clearance patriot"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_clearance
Personally I consider Q to be similar to nostrodamous . Have you ever read Nostrodamous? He was an olden days French fortune teller, like a phsyic who said he could predict the future. His writings seem nonsensical until you look back and apply your knowledge of future events. Future proves past. I'm not saying the anons who decipher the q drops are wrong or or anything. Thats just one of my takes on it.
Agreed, it's best to stick to the drops. https://qposts.online/
Read the drops, make your own connections. Contrary to what the MSM would have people think, there are plenty of things Q has never touched. Sometimes anons talking is just anons talking.
I have never once put any thought into the numbers game.
To me it's noise and distraction.
Count the number of fucks I don't give, divide by 17, add 45 and then read up on COINTELPRO.
You know, the thing.... lol. It's been a long time since that name crossed my eyeballs. But I remember.
My only problem is being told I have a problem before getting my first sip of coffee in me.
Must we all Anon the same way? You do you, I'll do me and with luck our combined efforts all lead to a positive outcome.
If that's not good enough for you, that sounds like a you problem. I don't need your approval to think my own thoughts, or view events from my own perspective.
Would you prefer only numberfag anons were welcome here?
Did Q ever mention having an opinion on devisivness and driving people away from the movement?
I know the answer. Do you remember? Ok? Ok.