Ok I took the time to read the article and it states the same conclusion:
The short answer is it doesn’t prove Jim Watkins is Q, despite people shouting that online all week.
The "Watkins is Q" line is the latest shill attempt to discredit Q and that seems to be all it is.
The actual argument seems to be that Watkins could post as Q if he wanted to, which could be true, but then Q team would know about the fake posts pretty quickly so it's not much of an argument.
Ok I took the time to read the article and it states the same conclusion:
The "Watkins is Q" line is the latest shill attempt to discredit Q and that seems to be all it is.
The actual argument seems to be that Watkins could post as Q if he wanted to, which could be true, but then Q team would know about the fake posts pretty quickly so it's not much of an argument.
Pens also don't prove anything.
Prove anything? No.
Coincidence? Yes.