We all knew it was bullshit, Q remarked almost 2 years ago now that JFK Jr was dead. Q has EXPLICITLY STATED THIS. If you're still a believer of this, wake the fuck up and get back to the Q roots. You're hurting the movement. I didn't think people were stupid enough to believe this, but there ARE some legit Q-supporters who do (bless your hearts I still love you). From here on out there is no excuse, if you still believe this shit you are a SHILL. Today you can see how this sort of disinformation is then weaponized.
Q is spot on with his post today about the media conflating Q with Anons. The method is being used all across Twitter today. You must differentiate Q words from Anon words and make it obvious. Very easy to debunk these media guys on Twitter, just post a screenshot of Q saying the opposite of what they are alleging. It's simple and effective proof. Teach them about the obvious difference between a rando anon and Q.
I created an account on this website just so I could comment on your post; your incredibly offensive post. I have followed Q since the beginning. I am quite active on the Great Awakening board. I have not followed main stream media since the late 90s. I think and research for myself and come to my own conclusions which is one of the key reasons I follow Q. I am not a shill in any way, shape or form.
For you to say “We can all state….” and “We all knew it was bullshit.” makes me wonder if you are a Q supporter at all. You do not speak for “all” of us and name calling people who don’t believe what you believe is what really goes completely against Q’s overriding message of thinking and researching for yourself.
As far as “hurting the movement;” that is pure bullshit. People/organizations who want to slander Q will do so no matter what and it will be a cold day in hell when I start caring about that.
As far as JFK, Jr. being alive; I have done quite a bit of research on this topic and I have concluded for myself that there is a lot of contradictory information out there that clearly could make the case for him being alive, and while I don’t share my research or beliefs about it online, I am totally open to the possibility that it might be true. Further, I have no problem with others who choose to believe it or not as we are all entitled to believe what we want and no amount of name calling and proclamations of speaking for “all” of us is going to change that.
The only part of your post that I can agree with is that we should keep what Q says separate from any Anon’s interpretation of it; however, the Anon’s who want to share their interpretations should be encouraged to do so as it is what motivates others to go and do their own research to find out what we want to believe.
Finally, I want to say that I believe there is a very active AI program or some sort of concerted effort to put opinions/posts like yours on the Internet whereby you think that making someone feel bad, or wrong, or stupid for believing something will be enough to make them go away or change their opinion. Again, this goes against everything Q has tried to show us about thinking and researching for ourselves. You do not in any way, shape or form speak for me with your “we all know” bullshit and I’m glad for the opportunity to let you know that.
First off, don't be so offended...that is liberal level stuff.
Everything I wrote is my opinion based off of what Q has said, which I have also followed very closely and read every drop since the very beginning. To be more clear maybe I should have said that "people similar to me can all state...".
You can believe whatever you want, but I would ask you to explain Q's recent posts regarding this exact issue instead of approaching me, an anon, like I am the one coming out with this info. Q made it very clear recently that the JFK Jr stuff is BS. Seriously, check the recent posts along with the one from 2 years ago and write some paragraphs on what you think is wrong about them.
You have provided no proof of your perception of the world and Q says otherwise, why should I believe you? Why should I go with a random anon theory instead of Q, which is the exact point Q has been making recently? Yes, us anons figure things out on our own but if Q constantly denies or denounces something as false, why would you think and push for the exact opposite?
Lastly, no man... I'm not AI. I'm a normal human, but ya the AI-manipulation stuff does definitely exist across the internet.
The crash was def weird to say the least.... along with the search and a number of other aspects. Plus I’d think jr was familiar with MV. Lots to think about for sure