Rep. Matt Gaetz has publicly revealed a simple plan that could protect DJT from election interference and persecution. Let's first look at the dynamics occurring in congress and rationalize their meaning in accordance of Rep. Gaetz's very public statement.

In a recent WND article posted by u/LakotaPride entitled, "Rep. Jim Jordan announces investigation of Jack Smith's office for 'pressuring' lawyer Attorney told his job application would look better if client turned on Trump", it appears like there may be a multi-tier dragnet that congress is pursuing. Rep. Jim Jordan sending a letter to special counsel Jack Smith's office is further development that seems to follow congressman Matt Gaetz's plan. Gaetz has presented a number of strategies for how he and other Trump allies could protect the former president as he faces dozens of federal indictment charges. For example, he suggested that Republicans subpoena Smith to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, noting that if Smith refused to do so, he could be held in criminal contempt of Congress. House Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan's letter to special counsel Jack Smith may be the start of this action. Will Jack Smith provide the requested communications by September 21st? There is also the subpoena sent to Fulton County DA Fani Willis requesting all communications with the Biden Administration, Special Counsel, and DOJ. Rep. Jim Jordan has already subpoenaed former Manhattan prosecutor Mark Pomerantz to appear before the Congressional Judiciary. Despite Pomerantz repeatedly invoking the 5th Amendment not to answer questions, many tidbits may have been learned from Pomerantz's appearance under oath and what has already been gleaned from his book.

"Although I have written and spoken publicly about the Trump investigation, I did so before any criminal charges were brought against Mr. Trump,” Pomerantz said in his statement to the Judiciary Committee. “Now that a grand jury has indicted him, the circumstances have changed." -- former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz.

Back in March 2023, Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil sent a letter to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg demanding communications, documents, and testimony relating to Bragg's communication with the DOJ, its component entities, or other federal law enforcement agencies referring or relating to your office’s investigation of President Donald Trump. The deadline was not later than 10:00 a.m. on March 23, 2023. This letter is similar to the letter recently sent to DA Fanni Willis.

Recently, Gaetz suggested that Congress vote to “defund” the special counsel’s office, limiting additional actions that Smith could take against the former president. IMHO, if SC Jack Smith refuses to respond in good faith by the September 21 deadline, Jordan can invoke a 'contempt of Congress' violation against Smith. Furthermore, Gaetz's suggestion of 'defunding' Jack Smith would be accordingly an option the Judiciary Committee should take.

Ultimately, these actions would lead up to bringing DJT in as a witness. As Matt Gaetz stated, "Afterwards, you can actually bring President Trump in to give testimony to the Congress and, in doing so, immunize him."

Do you see how this could be playing out?

Rep. Matt Gaetz has publicly revealed a simple plan that could protect DJT from election interference and persecution. Let's first look at the dynamics occurring in congress and rationalize their meaning in accordance of Rep. Gaetz's very public statement.

In a recent WND article posted by u/LakotaPride entitled, "Rep. Jim Jordan announces investigation of Jack Smith's office for 'pressuring' lawyer Attorney told his job application would look better if client turned on Trump", it appears like there may be a multi-tier dragnet congress is pursuing. Rep. Jim Jordan sending a letter to special counsel Jack Smith's office is further development that seems to follow congressman Matt Gaetz's plan. Gaetz has presented a number of strategies for how he and other Trump allies could protect the former president as he faces dozens of federal indictment charges. For example, he suggested that Republicans subpoena Smith to appear before the House Judiciary Committee, noting that if Smith refused to do so, he could be held in criminal contempt of Congress. House Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan's letter to special counsel Jack Smith may be the start of this action. Will Jack Smith provide the requested communications by September 21st? There is also the subpoena sent to Fulton County DA Fani Willis requesting all communications with the Biden Administration, Special Counsel, and DOJ. Rep. Jim Jordan has already subpoenaed former Manhattan prosecutor Mark Pomerantz to appear before the Congressional Judiciary. Despite Pomerantz repeatedly invoking the 5th Amendment not to answer questions, many tidbits may have been learned from Pomerantz's appearance under oath and what has already been gleaned from his book.

"Although I have written and spoken publicly about the Trump investigation, I did so before any criminal charges were brought against Mr. Trump,” Pomerantz said in his statement to the Judiciary Committee. “Now that a grand jury has indicted him, the circumstances have changed." -- former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz.

Back in March 2023, Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil sent a letter to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg demanding communications, documents, and testimony relating to Bragg's communication with the DOJ, its component entities, or other federal law enforcement agencies referring or relating to your office’s investigation of President Donald Trump. The deadline was not later than 10:00 a.m. on March 23, 2023. This letter is similar to the letter recently sent to DA Fanni Willis.

Recently, Gaetz suggested that Congress vote to “defund” the special counsel’s office, limiting additional actions that Smith could take against the former president. IMHO, if SC Jack Smith refuses to respond in good faith by the September 21 deadline, Jordan can invoke a 'contempt of Congress' violation against Smith. Furthermore, Gaetz's suggestion of 'defunding' Jack Smith would be accordingly an option the Judiciary Committee should take.

Ultimately, these actions would lead up to bringing DJT in as a witness. As Matt Gaetz stated, "Afterwards, you can actually bring President Trump in to give testimony to the Congress and, in doing so, immunize him."

Do you see how this could be playing out?