I don't usually downvote u/ashlanddog, but when I do it's because Ashland made an unhelpful statement (in this case one on which I already answered the OP in detail).

Anybody could copy the IRS typing format and put Egger's name on it in the 80s, getting the US Attorney's name (Roger Duncan) incorrect; nor would Egger have written such tripe, which could only have been thought to be effective by those who believe they found the silver bullet by rejecting the supreme law and the Supreme Court. The true byzantine labyrinth is quite deeper than the deceptive 16th, but it must remain legally accessible to the common man via the statutes and code. That's why I tell everyone to read the law and apply it scrupulously.

Hmm, didn't you just invoke Finder as to the stupidity of posting the same OP, and now you invoke as to the stupidity of downvoting against OP? Very sus fren. Add: No wait, maybe you mean the downvoter of you rather than Ashland, and maybe you mean your "it's prolly real" to be sarcasm? Fine, I'll downgrade my assessment of you, from you being wrong, to you just being unable to convey sarcasm accurately.

I don't usually downvote u/ashlanddog, but when I do it's because Ashland made an unhelpful statement (in this case one on which I already answered the OP in detail).

Anybody could copy the IRS typing format and put Egger's name on it in the 80s, getting the US Attorney's name (Roger Duncan) incorrect; nor would Egger have written such tripe, which could only have been thought to be effective by those who believe they found the silver bullet by rejecting the supreme law and the Supreme Court. The true byzantine labyrinth is quite deeper than the deceptive 16th, but it must remain legally accessible to the common man via the statutes and code. That's why I tell everyone to read the law and apply it scrupulously.

Hmm, didn't you just invoke Finder as to the stupidity of posting the same OP, and now you invoke as to the stupidity of downvoting against OP? Very sus fren.