Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest some steps toward addressing this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Use the list to get more people on your side, construct mailing lists, contact sheets, etc. Let people know what problems exist. Have people sign on to petitions. Know who you’re signing on if you can, because you don’t want to alert the people you’re going against any sooner than needed. This is an important step if they decide to be violent. Remember, this sort of action will be moving against local money and local control.
4. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical and business quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
5. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.
6. PRAY. 0. PRAY.

If you notice silly things like … oh, say, pentagrams, it may also help to look around for the relevant clubs and start trying to find things out about who’s running certain interests.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest some steps toward addressing this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Use the list to get more people on your side, construct mailing lists, contact sheets, etc. Let people know what problems exist. Have people sign on to petitions. Know who you’re signing on if you can, because you don’t want to alert the people you’re going against any sooner than needed. This is an important step if they decide to be violent. Remember, this sort of action will be moving against local money and local control.
4. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical and business quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
5. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.

If you notice silly things like … oh, say, pentagrams, it may also help to look around for the relevant clubs and start trying to find things out about who’s running certain interests.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest some steps toward addressing this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Use the list to get more people on your side, construct mailing lists, contact sheets, etc. Let people know what problems exist. Have people sign on to petitions. Know who you’re signing on if you can, because you don’t want to alert the people you’re going against any sooner than needed.
4. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical and business quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
5. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.

If you notice silly things like … oh, say, pentagrams, it may also help to look around for the relevant clubs and start trying to find things out about who’s running certain interests.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest some steps toward addressing this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical and business quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
4. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.
5. Use the list to get more people on your side, construct mailing lists, contact sheets, etc. Let people know what problems exist. Have people sign on to petitions. Know who you’re signing on if you can, because you don’t want to alert the people you’re going against any sooner than needed.

If you notice silly things like … oh, say, pentagrams, it may also help to look around for the relevant clubs and start trying to find things out about who’s running certain interests.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest a three step solution to this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical and business quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
4. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.

If you notice silly things like … oh, say, pentagrams, it may also help to look around for the relevant clubs and start trying to find things out about who’s running certain interests.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest a three step solution to this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information. Look for geographical quirks in the precinct/county layouts that they might be intentionally exploiting to their advantage.
4. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.

Several months ago, u/Slechta5614 and I brought up the concept of a mapping project. Several people expressed interest, but while enthusiastic, I didn’t end up having the bandwidth to start making rubber meet the road.

That project (https://greatawakening.win/p/17si5CTrPS/mapping-project/c/) was and is intended to help as an umbrella for concepts like this one, however, and will be useful at some point. Tag me if still interested.

Where this becomes relevant is in Phase 2 of the Pincher move we are looking to execute on the deep state. Top down AND Bottom up. Local action = national results.

We, as citizens who are not in the “big club”, are at an information disadvantage and need to start working to rectify that problem. One way it manifests is in elections. They’ve gerrymandered us into corners all over the country. “Hey, you mostly rural county, you’re looking too red, here’s a university to get you ‘educated’.”

Turns out, the indoctrinated class presidents from those universities, who have never actually worked but do know how to campaign and game out office runs and grease palms, graduate with connections in the university system and democrat/activist organizations.

Now, say you have a largely rural county, as noted in the above quote. They could, and have, take their precincts and divide them up in such a way as to completely disenfranchise everyone in a given precinct from any access to representation, while binding them to the whims of people who don’t even live in the county. The university population and dorm capacities can easily be made to overpopulate the property owners in the precinct, thus locking that precinct in to whatever club whims happen to be, with no apparent voting recourse.

One major handicap we have in this effort is a major information disadvantage. They have it, we don’t, and we don’t even know the damn game.

To work on resolving that, I suggest a three step solution to this issue when the problem is identified:

1. Acquire a list of all property owners, addresses, contact information in the county, by precinct (as much info as possible)
2. Map out the laws around electoral guarantees, forms and procedures needed to make demands (not requests), and the numeric and practical issues in play
3. Show how conflicting constituencies have been intentionally grouped together against the clear incentive interests of conflicting parties. Prove that one party cannot win any election as the vote is constructed, and point out that the people who drew the lines knew this. You may want to get that person’s name(s) before presenting your information.
4. Demand equal, constitutionally guaranteed, Republican (not the party, the form of government) representation, attack negation of egregious things that oppositional parties have attempted to foist on grieved parties, and demand correction and recompense for the problems, which were done without consultation or consent.

u/christine_grab is that a half decent plan of attack on part of this issue? I’m new to this.