Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.
The most interesting aspect of the Civil War is that when the 11 states seceded, the original Amendment XIII TONA was automatically re-ratified as the percent of states remaining that had ratified it went over 75%, making it verifiably effective after 40 years of attempts to hide that it was fully re-ratified on January 30th, 1824 and incorporated into "Military Laws of the United States" in 1825. Amendment XIII TONA automatically strips citizenship if one takes any "emolument" from a foreign power. Applied today this strips all DC people, and all Corp State officials down to the city level of their REPUBLIC citizenship, automatically.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b690DoWm/preview-confirmation-of-amendmen/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2w00Z/checkmate-deep-state-bitches-mil/c/
Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.
The most interesting aspect of the Civil War is that when the 11 states seceded, the original Amendment XIII TONA was automatically re-ratified as the percent of states remaining that had ratified it went over 75%, making it verifiably effective after 40 years of attempts to hide that it was fully re-ratified on January 30th, 1824 and incorporated into "Military Laws of the United States" in 1825. Amendment XIII TONA automatically strips citizenship if one takes any "emolument" from a foreign power. Applied today this strips all DC people, and all Corp State officials down to the city level of their citizenship, automatically.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b690DoWm/preview-confirmation-of-amendmen/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2w00Z/checkmate-deep-state-bitches-mil/c/
Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.
The most interesting aspect of the Civil War is that when the 11 states seceded, the original Amendment XIII TONA was automatically re-ratified as the percent of states remaining that had ratified it went over 75%, making it verifiably effective after 40 years of attempts to hide that it was fully re-ratified on January 30th, 1824 and incorporated into "Military Laws of the United States" in 1825. Amendment XIII TONA automatically strips citizenship if one takes any "emolument" from a foreign power. Applied today this strips all DC people, and all Corp State officials down to the city level of their citizenship, automatically. https://greatawakening.win/p/16b690DoWm/preview-confirmation-of-amendmen/ https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2w00Z/checkmate-deep-state-bitches-mil/c/
Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.
The most interesting aspect of the Civil War is that when the 11 states seceded, the original Amendment XIII TONA was automatically re-ratified as the percent of states remaining that had ratified it went over 75%, making it verifiably effective after 40 years of attempts to hide that it was fully re-ratified on January 30th, 1824 and incorporated into "Military Laws of the United States" in 1825. Amendment XIII TONA automatically strips citizenship if one takes any "emolument" from a foreign power. Applied today this strips all DC people, and all Corp State officials down to the city level of their citizenship, automatically.
Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.