https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
In June of 2013, the Supreme Court issued its opinion for No. 12–398, ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., ET AL. The link is above.
I've heard that this case set the stage for the patenting of humans whose DNA has been altered by the vaccine and that altered DNA is synthetic (e.g. cDNA), therefore patentable, therefore ownable. Ownable, modified, human cattle.
Nothing that is naturally occuring can be patented, and my limited understanding of DNA and mRNA processes leaves me wondering about this.
Can anyone explain this more clearly than the Court's opinion? tyia