1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're looking at in from the perspective of it being a movie, which is understandable, but it sort of puts the cart before the horse doesn't it?

Paparazzi take pictures of people who are part of social significance, and a tabloid reported on it. Some things really don't have much significance other than "guy wore a mask."

What sort of pattern? People who are hung?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not at all, no. The amount of coordination that would have to require without any single leak of that breaking would imply that there is a significant portion of the population that is not only complicit, but also participating. While the theory sounds interesting, for an operation to happen at that scale you'd need some pretty cut and dry evidence, no room for interpretation.

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

All right, so, yes, that is different and interesting.

What else?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds good! Seems like it

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kate Spade the designer? She was hung. What more to the story is there that you know

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry my question wasn’t clear

What is the significance of the time and vogue magazine covers? Did they feature body doubles?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right I’ve seen the footage that day. My own conclusion is that the later appearance of Hillary being anyone other than Hillary is very far fetched.

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

No that makes even less sense

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right discussed by who? Just people on a forum? Just because her hair looked different?

What was it, specifically, that convinced you? Or are you just open to the idea?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

So for the news, they’d have to be aware that they use old footage right? Like the news anchors, and the editors, and the sound mixers, all of them. Seems pretty far fetched for all of them to be in on it and keep it all a secret

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah actually I’ve got a buddy in the military. We’ve seen this theory before.

As I recall, military does not have medals on their overcoats, so that’s not odd. Second, the social distancing aspect was the explanation for the distance and the lack of that help. But also the prior year when trump did the wreath ceremony it was similar to how biden does it, so it’s not like this is a new thing

2
ALL-ABOARD 2 points ago +2 / -0

So why make footage in advance if they can just take her out to lunch now, and be in plain clothes?

2
ALL-ABOARD 2 points ago +2 / -0

So like the back of her head or what?

2
ALL-ABOARD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just because all things are possible (which, at the moment, they are not) doesn’t mean that all things happen.

Im still waiting on the answer to when there was a swap made where a double was pushed out. What confirms the presence of the double?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you just have a lot of trouble saying “go” and “through” separately. I had no problem, plenty of others seem to be doing fine as well

You’re certainly free to take artistic liberties with rhyme and meter, I’m not saying you can’t. But every version that was shared has the same rhyme structure and same meter. They were all consistent and flowed smoothly.

Yours doesn’t.

If you want to record yourself saying it out loud, go for it. But until then I don’t think anything that you type will change the fact that you’re version varies greatly from the others people shared, in that it’s awkwardly paced and doesn’t have the same structure as every other stanza shared.

Take care man. Learn from your mistakes. I’m not trying to say that to be a dick, I mean just use time to reflect and learn what people are trying to tell you. And probably how to say “go” without saying “through”

2
ALL-ABOARD 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sorry, I’m not following the Hitler magazine cover connection. Could you explain that?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand that Barnwell is someone that looks like Clinton, but she’s never been put out in the open AS Hillary Clinton. She hasn’t spoken AS Hillary Clinton, or been photographed AS Hillary Clinton. She’s always Theresa Barnwell, is she not?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

The user said that was the real HRC though. You guys are disagreeing.

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

So then why have a double, if she’s able to be in public and speak? Now this body double thing seems even less logical

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I’m definitely familiar with the incident you’re referring to. I’m asking who was it that said it was a double/replacement? Or was it just a theory that people were suggesting?

What made it obvious to you that it was a double?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re suggestion is the video was taken at this restaurant years in advance? So wouldn’t the staff have to be in on it?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Said to be by who?

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at the lyrics posted by OP, and the one posted by the comment you “corrected”

In all instances, you have the rhyme structure AABBA, and constituent meter. All 6 verses. It’s a children’s rhyme and fits with the structure of the original.

Yours does not. It’s doesn’t rhyme, it doesn’t have the same meter. Let it go. Everyone else here has pointed out the inconsistencies with yours politely and you’ve ignored them. Say it out loud if it helps.

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

not sure what this has to do with Hillary being able to walk around in public when you claim she was arrested. Other users here seem to disagree with you.

1
ALL-ABOARD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Photos have been taken this year, by several different groups. Two weeks ago a video was taken of her at a restaurant (Le Bioquet in manhattan) with several people walking around, some in masks.

The restaurant can be looked up on any map/website to see that it was the place where she was sitting with Bill.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›