He was pretty much completely against TikTok awhile back. Now that the House wants to force a sale of TikTok, he suddenly does a 180 and apparently vouches for TikTok while redirecting attention to the misdeeds of Facebook.

Wowowow. Another classic Trump move?

Has TikTok's future now been determined and "secured" such that it isn't a threat anymore? There's been talks of Mnuchin setting up an investor's fund to buy TikTok. We'll see how that plays out.

I see a lot of people online taking the opportunity to say Trump has basically betrayed fellow conservatives and sold out to the Chinese over TikTok to gain funding from the billionaires who own Bytedance.

Could these people be missing the fact that there's a good portion of Trump's support base who uses, could potentially use, or could be converted from current TikTok users?

A lot of TikTok users are pissed right now and they have a genuine point. Out of all the issues the elected officials can agree upon that are absolutely vital to the survival of their nation and the quality of their lives, they choose TikTok. A fun platform where a lot of people get information and have found a voice at.

The political payoff of being for the TikTok ban when it actually happen is probably something like 1 to 9. Meaning you'll gain 1 supporter for every 9 you lose. And most of that one were probably already going to choose Trump anyways.

The play is simple. Take the current anger from the TikTok upheaval and redirect it onto Zuckerberg (next target). The premise is that TikTok is secure from Trump's National Security perspective.

Simple, cunning and effective. All upside for Trump from his tweet.

“ The onset of troops is like the rush of a torrent that will even roll stones along in its course. The quality of decision is like the well-timed swoop of a falcon that enables it to strike and destroy its victim. Therefore the good fighter will be terrible in his onset, and prompt in his decision.

Energy may be likened to the bending of a crossbow; decision, to the releasing of the trigger.

Amid the turmoil and tumult of battle, there may be seeming disorder and yet no real disorder at all; amid confusion and chaos, your array may be without head or tail, yet it will be proof against defeat. Simulated disorder postulates perfect discipline; simulated fear postulates courage; simulated weakness postulates strength. Hiding order beneath the cloak of disorder is simply a question of subdivision; concealing courage under a show of timidity presupposes a fund of latent energy; masking strength with weakness is to be effected by tactical dispositions.”

Excerpt From The Art of War Sun Tzu

Here's a list of facts that I think most of us can agree on. I could never figure out Trump/Q's view on the whole matter and how it eventually plays out though. Wondering what you guys think here.

1. Trump based his whole campaign on being tough on China (rightfully so). And he has been consistent on this throughout his presidency.

2. Trump develops good relationship with Xi Jinping.

3. Q insinuates that Xi could be working with Trump to bring down deep state in April 2018?

4. Trump meets Kim in North Korea in June 2018(China seemed to have been helping)

5. First Phase of China tariffs begin July 2018

6. Globalist order tremendously benefitted China by hollowing out the US working class. Disrupting the order is diametrically opposed to China and Xi's interests.

7. COVID-19 emerges from Wuhan in winter of 2019 and seems to time perfectly with a couple of things. A. it rescued China's economy from potential collapse and prevented Phase II of the tariffs. B. It allowed the democrats to cheat in the Elections. 3. It destroyed Trump's vibrant economy. 4. It put China Joe into office.

8. Trump maintains a strong, but still friendly tone with Xi and China despite seemingly being screwed over by China.

9. The Biden administration (and the world) discovers in a hilarious fashion that Dong Jingwei has defected to the US. Being the Vice Minister of the Chinese Minister of Security, this is the highest level defection in the country's history.

If we look at these previous set of facts, it's difficult to understand what is going on in the background, but I'm going to offer what little I can glean from all of this.

1. The overarching goal of a wise General is to win a war without fighting. Globalists profit from war. Nations and Peoples suffer. If China miscalculates and decides to attack the US, the goal is still to subdue the enemy without direct conflict if possible. (read Sun-Tzu: Art of War) This is actually what Devolution has been about. To operate below the threshold of kinetic conflict (read Patel Patriot's Devolution).

2. Despite having cheated to put Biden into office, the Chinese economy is collapsing on its own nonetheless. Albeit perhaps in a slower fashion than if Trump were still in office?

3. Even though China has benefited from globalization, it is also a nation state very specific needs for its citizens. While some of its interests are aligned with the globalists, it must have its own unique interests as well. Perhaps Trump will seek to exploit this schism.

4. The Dong Jingwei defection, if true, means that somebody with serious political power decided to get this man out of China. People like Dong do not have the ability to freely travel abroad.

5. The question has probably always been this. How do you subdue China without going into open conflict? As Trump says, the US holds all the cards. The US could make China collapse within a week if it wanted to. Just tax the Treasury bills they hold and impose more Tariffs. But what would the next 10-20 years look like for China? Would that really be in the best interest of the US? Probably not. Remember the Art of War: Better to avoid direct conflict. Let the enemy present an opportunity for its own destruction. Better yet, let the enemy destroy itself. Do not initiate an attack unless you are certain of victory (paraphrasing).

I started a substack to keep record of things and continuity. Here's the link to this post if anybody is interested in following. I'll post what I write here anyhow. https://broadview.substack.com/p/a-few-contradictions-about-trump?s=w

“What the ancients called a clever fighter is one who not only wins, but excels in winning with ease. But his victories bring him neither reputation for wisdom nor credit for courage. For inasmuch as they are gained over circumstances that have not come to light, the world at large knows nothing of them, and he therefore wins no reputation for wisdom; and inasmuch as the hostile state submits before there has been any bloodshed, he receives no credit for courage.”

Excerpt From The Art of War

What is the essence of Q?

What does Q know that allows him to?

1. Make very accurate predictions regarding certain things (numbers, comms)?

2. Be able to make extremely bold statements regarding high level foreign actors and affairs?

My hypothesis is that Q’s predictions come from a US-centric perspective. Q may not have to get the exact sequences of events correct with regards to foreign events. But as long as Q is certain and correct about the way of American politics, its predictions regarding foreign will largely happen one way or another.

The reason I preface this post with the previous statement is that there seems to be a theory going around that Xi is coordinating with Trump. I have no conclusions on that theory. I merely wish to express my analysis and viewpoints as clearly as I can in this post.

On China:

First, let’s take a look at the beginning of Trump’s campaign. It began with him calling China out about their trade practices. It’s easily forgotten that this was his strongest stance during his entire campaign and throughout his presidency. The tariffs he eventually imposed on China was very damaging to them.

Many forget that the Chinese economy was in dire straits before COVID largely due to these tariffs and the fact that they had a real estate bubble and could not grow out of their troubles anymore via exploiting US export markets.

Then COVID happened and the rest is history. I considered the theory that Trump and Xi were coordinating together. Let’s not forget that it was China that allowed COVID to be unleashed onto the world. COVID destroyed Trump’s economy, it allowed the election to be stolen and it saved the Chinese economy.

Xi is in charge of the country. Things don’t happen on this scale without his consent. Perhaps Q gamed things out and did not predict Xi would take this path as it was not an “optimal” path to take. Perhaps Xi chose the less optimal option for his country if you consider it from a game theory perspective.

Remember, China is the biggest beneficiary of globalisation. Would Xi really be able to follow a plan by Trump that went against the trend that made modern China? Even if the plan was the best conclusion that a rational actor could hope for?

What is happening now:

We have a very interesting situation happening right now maybe a little lost in the background in the midst of this Russian/Ukraine war.

China has a Zero COVID Policy. Its success prior to what recently happened in Shanghai was one of the basis of Xi’s power. Xi is up for “re-election” this year btw. Shanghai is in lockdown. And many other provinces in China are beginning to do the same thing.

But something is different this time around versus when COVID just began.

This time, due to the “Omicron” variant, testing is rampant throughout China. Entire cities are forcefully requiring everyone to test every 48 hours while on lockdown. Basically, the economy in major parts of China has effectively stopped.

People are locked into their homes without food and the ability to earn money. And COVID infection cases are skyrocketing.

When COVID began in China, nobody did PCR testing. Hence, there were barely any cases outside of Wuhan.

Now we learned that doing such testing will only increase the rate of infections in the statistics. In China it may even increase infection rates as everybody has to be gathered together to do the testing.

The army was sent into Shanghai just two days ago to take over the testing and management of the outbreak.

Couple this with China’s real estate market issues and the fact that Shanghai is China’s financial centre. There is a serious shitstorm brewing that does not look good for Xi.

Hypothesis:

Xi was offered a plan from Trump.

Xi may have deviated from this plan due to overconfidence in himself.

But that’s OK since NCSWIC. Now Xi will have to live with the consequences of his decisions.

China’s strength comes from its access to the world order that the US has built and from its access to US markets.

China cannot directly confront the USA. It can only subvert the USA through its political system.

As long as the USA’s political system can correct itself (the key basis of Q’s posts), China is but a paper tiger.

And there are many ways to skin this cat.

To recap on the relevant part of the movie for this. In the movie, the final plan that Ramius and the Americans decided on (and the best plan if it were to work) was to have Ramius defect to the USA with the Red October submarine while convincing the Soviets that the Red October had been sunk and destroyed.

Ramius had an option to get off of the Red October along with the rest of his crew when he engineered the nuclear problem (see Part I).

However, he did not choose this option. Let’s imagine the chain of events had he taken this option. Moscow had asked the USA to intervene and shoot down the Red October on the premise that Ramius went rogue and wanted to fire nukes at the USA.

If Ramius had successfully defected to the USA and Moscow knew about it, Moscow would not be able to save face. Both the Soviets and the USA would know about the “caterpillar” technology the Soviets developed with the purpose of having nuclear warheads reach American shores undetected.

Moscow would then feel equally unsafe about the Red October being in the hands of the Americans. Nuclear tensions between the two countries would have gone through the roof and diplomatic relations could have broken down.

The consequences would have been incalculable. Ramius plan to remain inside the Red October to stage a “false flag” sinking of his own sub would have been the highest “yield” solution for both countries and for himself.

So how does this relate to Zelensky, Putin, Trump and the war in Ukraine right now?

My hypothesis is based on the premise that the current war is according to the plans of Trump and that Zelensky is not who he seems to be.

If you are of the view that Zelensky if simply a hypocrite or a defender of the deep state and are unwilling to entertain another possibility, then you should read no further.

First, the background of Zelensky. He was born and raised in Kryvyi Rih as a Russian speaker. He only learned Ukrainian and English afterwards.

His grandfather fought in the Red Army against the Nazis in the Second World War. His grandfather’s three other brothers all died by the Nazis.

Zelensky’s main platform for winning the election was to bring about a peace deal in Eastern Ukraine or the Donbass region.

Now let’s assume Zelensky genuinely wants peace in Donbass. When he came to power, what would have stopped him if he just wanted to make a straight deal with the Russians for peace?

The answer is very public now but it wasn’t so obvious back then to everybody in the West. The Nazis, Azov battalion, other rogue fighter groups, extremists in Ukraine financed by the US Deep State essentially would hold a legitimate Ukrainian government hostage.

Why couldn’t Trump just solve the problem himself you might ask?

Root out the evils in Ukraine while he was still in office and had power. Think about how dangerous that would have been for Trump had the current story not fully come out?

Kolomoisky and Soros funding of the Nazis would have done their best to push Russia into action in Ukraine. What could Trump do at that point? Bioweapons released for false flag attacks by the Russians, the media screaming Russian collusion.

It would be a horrible situation to be in. It had to be this way. Trump had to step away to let the Deep State reveal itself.

Now that we have the context of the whole situation in view, what can we begin to see?

We can begin to see what we need to get from this Ukraine war in the big picture of things.

We need to reveal the extent of Biden and Deep State corruption in the Ukraine.

We need to destroy the Nazi army occupation in the Ukraine.

We need to neutralize the biolabs in Ukraine to prevent false flags and another pandemic from happening.

There’s probably more that we cannot see, but what we can see is more than enough to paint the picture.

The evil that resides in Ukraine is our Red October.

Hence, Zelensky or Putin can fill the role of Ramius in our story.

Remember the posts that Zelensky was actually communicating with Putin in telling him exactly where to bomb?

Of course, none of this can be confirmed. There are things that will never be revealed to the public. But I have a feeling that by the time this war is over, Zelensky, Putin and Trump will have all achieved exactly what they wanted in the very beginning.

Zelensky will rid his country of the Nazi battalions that have essentially overthrown the regular army.

There will be peace in Donbass via a treaty with Putin.

Putin will have achieved a purge of all the US biolabs in Ukraine, secured a neutral Ukraine and peace in the Donbass region.

Trump will have shown the American people just how far Biden was willing to go to protect his corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

If you can see the big picture, you will see that it had to be this way and that the best is yet to come.

Edited for spacing.

First off, for those who did not see the movie or have forgotten about it, it’s about a Soviet submarine captain who decided to defect to the USA. Ramius is the captain of the soviet’s newest submarine that’s capable of holding large amounts of nukes and quiet enough to sneak into US coasts without detection. Ramius, is the only one who knows of his own plan to defect in the beginning. He then makes his plan known to core members on the sub who go along with the plan. However, there remains two problems. The rest crew can never know of this plan to defect or else there may be mutiny (mass unrest) and. Now one of the most brilliant parts of the movie IMO was Ramius’s plan to get his crew off of the submarine without the risk of letting the crew (excluding the core) know about the plan.

Ramius had his submarine engineer create a nuclear problem within the submarine and this forced the rest of the crew who were not in the loop to immediately abandon the sub and be rescued by a nearby American warship.

If you look at the parallels with the current situation, I think you can view the American public as the regular crew on board the Red October. The nuclear problem was something that completely united the crew to do the correct thing and get off the boat to defect to the USA (the good side in our case) whether they agreed with defection or not. I believe the mass defection in the movie parallels the “Great Awakening” for our present world.

I never really thought there would be a mass awakening from a revelation of pedophilia. It might be a part of it, but I don’t think it’s the whole picture. What Trump wants before his return, I believe, is to unite the entire country into one side. They will love the ultimate results, (defection as per the movie but something else in real life) but many will have many mental blocks about getting there so there must be something that firmly turns them to the right side. Is this going to be a “nuclear event” like the movie in combination with tales of corruption and pedophilia? I can’t say for sure yet.

I will explain what I think the role Zelensky has in this “movie” Red October in a later post if there’s any interest in this. And this post has gotten long.

Initially, I was only able to purchase Ivermectin for dogs, but I was finally able to purchase some human Ivermectin manufactured in India by Sunrise called Iversun - 12. They're dispersible tablets 12 mg, but there's no dosage information on the box.

It only says Ivermectin IP 12 mg, Excipients: Q.S. Dosage: As directed by the physician.

I don't have COVID, but I've had a mild dry cough for awhile now. Wanted to take it and give it a try.