Which part was degenerate?
Washington was one of many founders lol. Was he evil, or are you just spiraling again? A lack of information has that effect.
There's no nuance to your positions at all.
BTW, I'm flattered that you got emotional enough to surf through my post history.
upvote for tenacity
On the other hand who's interest is it in to continually import foreigners who share no American values?
Do you agree that this is a deliberate chess move against you?
Now ask yourself, are you playing against the pieces, or are you playing the hand that moves the pieces? You're busy worrying about the color of the pawns, when the hand moving them doesn't give two shits.
Have you ever seen that meme of crying Wojak hiding his face under a mask of Smug wojak?
Your hysterical spiral is proving my point. Great job. Derail harder.
Where are you seeing this bogeyman?
You answered the question in your next sentence. Why does the media go full court press on white supremacy? Good on you that you're not convinced, but let's not pretend that these boards aren't crawling with race baiters who prove their bogeyman exists. That's all the feds need to justify their overreach and violation of basic liberties.
The appropriate audience is Congress. That's how America works, and that's where the focus should be because that's where all the laws which have eroded our Republic originate.
People sort themselves out, and I agree with you on the second portion as well, but do you ever wonder why they go through all the effort? It has nothing to do with race. As long as you keep falling for this sleight of hand, your anger will be directed in the wrong direction.
Would you be able to tell if you were triggered.
You see how he phrases it? "We should not highlight the differences between racial groups, because racism".
How do you put quotations around something I never said? Weird.
He points only to skin color and doesn't point to DNA.
Where did I point to skin color? I pointed to international schemes to subvert western values.
Can you explain why 13% of the population commits 52% of all violent crime? Let's hear it. They didn't have a choice because of systemic racism, right?
Did I ever excuse this? I said, "People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group."
The easiest way to disprove your implication is to simply compare current crime stats to pre 1960s crime stats. What does that suggest to you? What do you think dramatically changed?
You proved my point by not being able to answer your own question. Look up stats by race in regards to homosexuality and transgenderism. The results shouldn't surprise you when you consider what I said.
No.
I’m speaking of the bogeyman which CRT insists on. That bogeyman is manifested for their purposes through hates hoaxes such as Charlottesville, as well as through 1488 propaganda spread online for cringey edgelords to parrot on social media. People who fall for it are serving as conduits for their narrative. Why is that hard to understand?
I pulled all of these quotes, save the first, from Discrimination and Disparities by T. Sowell. If you decide to read it for yourself, you’ll find citations for every claim. You should follow up by researching the history of urban political machines such as Tammany Hall, and the Albany Regency. You should also read some George Fitzugh for deeper insights into the mind of an elite Democrat. Lastly, if you every become self-aware, there’s hope that you might notice that your rhetoric parallels that of a progressive; you agree with their basic premise, you just propose different solutions.
Detroit is perhaps the most striking example of a once thriving city ruined by years of liberal social policies. Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit's black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent.
In nineteenth-century Detroit, blacks had been denied the right to vote in 1850, but they were voting in the 1880s, and in the 1890s blacks were being elected to statewide offices in Michigan by a predominantly white electorate.
The 1880 census showed that, in Detroit, it was not uncommon for blacks and whites to live next door to each other. The black upper class had regular social interactions with upper-class whites, and their children attended high schools and colleges with the children of their white counterparts.
Despite all the voluminous writings making an intellectual or moral case for a confiscation of income and wealth, in the name of “social justice,” there has been remarkably little attention paid to the question of the extent to which this can actually be done in any comprehensive, long-run sense. In the short run, confiscation can easily be done, whether by governments or by mobs looting stores. Detroit has been a classic example of both—and of the long-run consequences. Nevertheless, killing the goose that lays the golden egg is a viable strategy form a purely political standpoint, provided the goose does not die before the next election.
A two-decades-long career for one man as mayor of Detroit, from 1974 to 1994, was made possible by policies which drove the most economically productive people out of Detroit, ensuring the mayor’s consecutive reelections by the departure of those people most likely to vote against him. It also ensured the decline of Detroit
Nor was Detroit unique. Such a combination of political success, along with economic and social disaster, can be found in a number of American cities where one political party has stayed in power for decades through redistributionist policies which drove out people who had much human capital, and left the city a hollow shell of its former self, after those tax-paying and job-creating people were gone. Third World nations that have had major confiscations of tangible wealth—whether the capital of foreign investors (“nationalization” of industries) or domestic entrepreneurs—have often suffered a similar fate for similar reasons.
This is who they are.
It’s really sad that you couldn’t refrain from spiraling.
Along with your childlike susceptibility to propaganda, all you’ve managed to prove is your shallow understanding of any relevant topic related to this subject. Before I educated myself on the topic, I used to subscribe to the same easy notions that you’re regurgitating as if it really was all as simple as, “this is who they are.”
You should spend some time trying to recognize the fallacies and projections in your response, and then deconstruct the thought patters which caused you to make them.
Or you can just keep insulting me.
You missed the point. Let’s contemplate your response.
What does South Detroit have to do with the machinations of an international political scheme to undermine western culture? You need to understand that the resentment which you just expressed is already accounted for, especially by those who craft these dubious narratives. Instead of directing your energy and focus upon changing the long established and well fortified machine which created, perpetuated, and actively reinforces the conditions which haunt South Detroit, you instead chose to pay mind to the lowly miserable demons who exist only as a product of the machine.
People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group.
“Mi fellow Americanos, el stormo is upon us”
DOITQ.png
Where can I make a generous donation to the human fund?
This is gold
Orange man badass
I lol’d but 47 years of leeching off of the public treasury is hardly nothing…
Beautiful
Hear Hear! Long may the frogs croak!
This might be my favorite meme.