12
Arterius 12 points ago +12 / -0

Alright then, I guess working 20 years as a video editor in this industry, I do not know how camera angles work. Thank you for your honesty, bye!!!

2
Arterius 2 points ago +3 / -1

So that means the inauguration didn't actually happen at the right time? That explains why it was broadcasted 10 minutes earlier.

8
Arterius 8 points ago +9 / -1

Notice the blue arrow person, standing right behind Jill in ver2, he should show in both versions, regardless of camera angles.

6
Arterius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Exactly, you cannot see another person who were the same between the 2 versions except those 3, notice the masks in the crowd. different masks.

8
Arterius 8 points ago +8 / -0

I totally get that, but it depends if this was 'streamed live' but it was actually a pre-recording.

15
Arterius 15 points ago +15 / -0

Now that it makes sense, when I first heard that on Simon Parke's video, I thought he was insane, now maybe not.. we shall see... this shit is getting weird.

3
Arterius 3 points ago +3 / -0

True, I wonder if this was 'live' footage? If yes, means they "faked" it, it was shot beforehand, edited, and then uploaded as "live"

13
Arterius 13 points ago +15 / -2

I've already debunked the camera angle, the girl in pink (red arrow) is actually in front of the woman (green arrow). but you don't see her in timeline version 2, also the camera pulls back to show the whole stage at the end, the two girls are not there. Also notice the blue arrow person in ver2, he stands right behind Jill, should show up in both angles.

5
Arterius 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also notice the girl in pink, is actually in front of the woman I labelled with green arrow.

10
Arterius 10 points ago +10 / -0

initially I thought it was camera angle as well (I'm a video editors, with 20 years of experience), but if you actually watch the entire footage, at the end, the camera pull back to show the whole thing, it remains in timeline version 2

1
Arterius 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, I wonder if this was 'live' footage? If yes, means they "faked" it, it was shot beforehand, edited, and then uploaded as "live"

2
Arterius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correction, I see what you mean, it does seem weird. maybe I'll try to create a few screen shots and compare.

3
Arterius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just camera angle, one is shot from the side, and the other shot straight on.

5
Arterius 5 points ago +5 / -0

Secret Service

by skanon
4
Arterius 4 points ago +4 / -0

red dress was back in 2009

view more: ‹ Prev