biden swear in on tv was a 2 videos composite: - The Great Awakening

biden swear in on tv was a 2 videos composite: (www.youtube.com)

posted 3 years ago by bdizzle3000 3 years ago by bdizzle3000 +21 / -1

30 comments

30 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (30)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– bdizzle3000 [S] 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=q5iCPKDp4V4

730ish start 740, 2 girls, white outfit white mask, pink outfit pink mask walk up with him. not seen in previous shot

800, they gone

822, they back

830, they gone

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– aquasmurf 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

You should watch this.

The girl in the pink is Natalie. She's one of the alleged to be in compromising photos on Hunter's laptop.

Anyway, they are there from beginning to end.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Slyver 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

The question is not whether the girls are in other shots, the question is, how many takes were there before Biden got his lines right? Also, how did they do multiple takes on "live TV?"

I am not saying it was not live TV. I am making no definitive statements at all. I am saying look at the evidence being presented. I am not finding a continuity of the surrounding crowd (not just the girls) between the two "camera angles".

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Arterius 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

True, I wonder if this was 'live' footage? If yes, means they "faked" it, it was shot beforehand, edited, and then uploaded as "live"

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q