I remember saying "be here or be queer" at least once a day. We weren't that clever in my senior class of 17 country bumpkins, so I feel like we heard it somewhere. Just now tried to find a gif for that phrase. Tried Brave, ducksuckgo, and Qwant. Not one single result that wasn't defining queer or telling me if queer is an acceptable word to use. The new Internet world sucks.
Spent this cool morning changing oil in some ranch vehicles and minor maintenance issues, then we put up 14 patio doors where we had replaced screens. Decided to take the window screens to Ace Hardware and let them do those. I had enough of that nonsense. Took them to have a burger and then headed home. On the way home I pointed out a couple of military helichopters flying South. My daughter commented that she's seen far more military in the sky than normal and wondered why. I took this opportunity to have a discussion about Russia being at our doorsteps, gave some education about Russia and Ukraine, and told them not to worry, that we are protected and nobody is taking out the Oklahoma Boonies. Told them I would worry about our own government before Russia, and before I could explain my one 'fear", my 15 year old said, "just hope they don't use Russia as an excuse to pull another 9/11." He beat me to it. Couldn't have been more proud. Had to share, and thank you for listening my frens.
Riddle me this...why do I get downdooted into oblivion for mentioning this obviously important drop? Why does it hurt your little role playing vajayjays to simply use the information you have gained as we are supposed to, and drop all references to 17? Sure, I realize that this place is centered on 17, so speaking among the choir is a little different, but being angered by an important post because it doesn't fit into your role playing fantasy doesn't make any sense. Why the need to cherry pick what fits your game narrative?
I just want some clarity in the subject.
4734
Focus on content [information].
Research for yourself.
gatekeeper
noun
a person that controls access, as to information, often acting as an arbiter of quality or legitimacy:
an open internet allows innovators to bypass traditional gatekeepers and promote their work on its own merit.
a guardian; monitor
Deploy camouflage.
Drop all references re: 'Q' 'Qanon' etc. to avoid ban/termination _censorship install.
Algos [sniffers] bypass.
Keep charging, Midnight Riders!
[Revere's 'Midnight' Ride]
Delivery of free-information.
[bypass controlled media narrative].
Q
Its very strange, i click on it and see the pic of Hogan, scrol down and have just enough time to see the first comment from a wrestling fan pede, then instantly everything goes black. No other posts seem affected.
Me-
Can artificial intelligence be given parameters to limit information to certain viewpoints and feed a narrative?
Bard-
Yes, artificial intelligence (AI) can be given parameters to limit information to certain viewpoints and feed a narrative. This is possible through various techniques, each with its limitations and ethical considerations:
-
Data filtering and selection: AI models can be trained on datasets curated to reflect specific viewpoints. This can be done by selecting data sources, removing certain information, or weighting data points differently. However, this approach can lead to biased outputs and limit exposure to diverse perspectives.
-
Algorithmic design and weighting: The algorithms themselves can be designed to prioritize certain types of information or narratives. This can be achieved by adjusting weights, thresholds, and other parameters within the model. However, this raises concerns about transparency and manipulation, as the underlying logic may not be readily apparent to users.
-
Natural language processing (NLP) techniques: Techniques like sentiment analysis and topic modeling can be used to identify and emphasize specific viewpoints within text or conversation. This can be used to create narratives that align with a desired perspective. However, NLP techniques can be sensitive to language nuances and context, potentially misrepresenting information or amplifying biases.
-
Generative AI: AI can be used to generate new text or content that conforms to a specific viewpoint or narrative. This can be done through techniques like text generation, translation, and summarization. However, this raises concerns about the authenticity and factuality of the generated content, as it may not be grounded in real-world evidence.
Ethical considerations: While it's technically possible to limit information and feed narratives with AI, it's important to consider the ethical implications:
Bias and manipulation: AI can perpetuate and amplify existing biases, potentially leading to misinformed or discriminatory outcomes.Transparency and accountability: It's crucial to understand how AI models are designed and trained to ensure transparency and accountability in their outputs.Freedom of information and diverse perspectives: Limiting information and narratives can restrict access to diverse viewpoints and hinder critical thinking.
Therefore, while AI can be used to shape information and narratives, it's crucial to do so responsibly and ethically, considering potential biases, promoting transparency, and ensuring respect for diverse perspectives.
I hope this information helps you understand the capabilities and limitations of AI in influencing information and narratives. Remember, critical thinking and responsible use of technology are essential in navigating the evolving landscape of information access and manipulation.
Well, there you have it, straight from the horses mouth.
Thought I would give ai a shot, so used Bard and asked one simple question. Wording and specifications are important. So, how does one go from primordial ooze to human without adding genetic material? Seems like a fair questiin since we're all supposedly here thru happenstance. Conversation follows.
What observable process adds genetic information to an existing mammals genes? No theoretics please, only replicate and observable facts.
expand_moreedit
View other drafts
volume_up
Currently, there are no known observable processes that directly add genetic information to an existing mammal's germline DNA (the DNA that is passed on to offspring) in a way that is replicable and verifiable.
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
