Link —> https://x.com/JoeLange/status/2067262703492567527?s=20
https://nitter.net/JoeLange/status/2067262703492567527?s=20
This is an interesting development.
Don’t miss the important SIGNAL.
FISA is the KEY.
Trump knew that placing Pulte as “acting” DNI would cause instant panic in DC, because he’s loyal to Trump and has already exposed some big government officials for mortgage fraud.
There was panic on both sides of the aisle over Pulte, so Trump nominated Jay Clayton from the SDNY to replace him.
Trap set.
The democrats offered to renew FISA, if the republicans quickly confirm Clayton.
FISA goes both ways.
But the democrats don’t like Clayton either.
Remember, AG Barr nominated him to head SDNY in Trump’s first term and Geoffrey Berman refused to step down from the position until someone was confirmed. Clayton was then pulled from consideration because he wasn’t likely to be confirmed. So Berman’s deputy was then nominated and confirmed.
Trump and Bondi placed Clayton as head of SDNY early in Trump’s second term and he was confirmed.
Mission accomplished.
Once Trump nominated Clayton to replace Pulte, the republicans quickly moved to confirm him.
But look what happened.
Now the democrats are refusing to pass the FISA renewal.
Really?
Who holds the leverage?
Trump holds all the cards. He’s trapped the democrats again.
Here’s something most people don’t know. It doesn’t matter whether or not the democrats vote to renew FISA.
Why?
(Brave search engine) “FISA Section 702 surveillance continues operating even if the statutory authorization lapses, because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) issues annual programmatic certifications that remain valid independently of Congress's renewal timeline.”
“The FISC renewed these certifications in March 2026, allowing collection to proceed legally until approximately March 2027 regardless of the statute's June 12, 2026 expiration.” ————— Checkmate!
The democrats have zero leverage and Trump can wait until after the Republicans win the midterms, to renew FISA.
And now Trump is upping the ante.
He says he “trapped” the republicans too.
He pulled Clayton’s nomination until his replacement at SDNY is confirmed. Trump wants Jamie McDonald confirmed as head of SDNY first.
Why?
SDNY is overseeing a whole lot of important conspiracy investigations and Trump is going to maintain control of that office.
Who is Jamie McDonald?
He served as Director of Enforcement at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during Trump's first term and was also on Trump’s legal team defending him in New York.
Are you beginning to see the big picture?
Maximum leverage is being applied. The enemy is trapped.
- They FEAR what Pulte will do as “acting” DNI because he doesn’t have to answer to Congress.
- They don’t want Jay Clayton confirmed because of what he ALREADY knows about all the investigations at SDNY.
- They don’t want Trump loyalist Jamie McDonald, to head SDNY.
And now Trump throws in the “kicker.”
Now Trump is also demanding that the SAVE Act be included in the FISA renewal.
Are you catching the SIGNAL?
FISA = START.
What’s about to START? ————- Q drop 3740 Dec 22, 2019 6:09:09 PM EST
https://x.com/wokesocieties//wokesocieties/status/1208139679528357889 Something BIG is coming. https://x.com/realdonaldtrum/realDonaldTrump/status/1208873492025925632 Do people really think this can happen with no consequences? FISA = START NOBODY is above the law [not anymore]. Q —————- As I have said many times, Trump doesn’t need the Senate to pass the SAVE Act. He can get it done through Executive Order and already knows he’ll win at the Supreme Court, making it a permanent “safeguard.”
I think Trump ALREADY knows FISA/SAVE Act won’t be renewed until AFTER the midterms.
He’s SIGNALING that election fraud and prosecutions are incoming.
FISA = START
I also believe that my “spitball” on Devin Nunes ending up as DNI is still in play.
If they refuse to confirm Jamie McDonald as head of SDNY, then Trump will leave Jay Clayton at SDNY and nominate someone new to head DNI as Pulte continues to pressure them.
Nunes would be the perfect choice.
Maybe that was always the plan. Quote Square profile picture Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47 · 7h Image 10:06 AM · Jun 17, 2026 ·
This is a question from P0ndHawk about the possible importance of the UFC 250 event. I think there is really something to this. This is the information I gathered from Yandex AI and Grok AI My Response to P0ndHawk
This is what I’ve been able to find because your question is very important. The White House was captured and burned by the British during the War of 1812 on August 24, 1814. Now the AI (Yandex) that I questioned insisted that the US flag was not captured at the White House at that time. It says that the US flag was still flying over Fort McHenry in September of 1814 and inspired Francis Scott Key to write the Star Spangled Banner. Then the AI goes on to insist that the US flag flies at the White House 24/7/365, regardless. AI refuses to allow that the flag might have been captured in August of 1814. When asked —What if the US flag had been captured? This is the answer: I can't answer this request. My responses are designed to be safe, respectful, and compliant with ethical principles. You may ask another question. So… More Info from Grok AI: Capturing an enemy national or regimental flag (colors) on the grounds of the opposing country’s designated capital during a battle would represent an even greater symbolic and psychological victory than a standard battlefield capture. In 19th-century warfare, flags already embodied unit honor, cohesion, and national pride. Seizing one in the enemy’s capital amplified this dramatically — it signaled not just a tactical win, but a profound humiliation and potential collapse of central authority.
Heightened Symbolic Impact Deeper national disgrace: Losing the flag (especially a national standard) at the seat of government symbolized the enemy’s inability to defend their core institutions. It went beyond a regiment’s shame to imply the state itself had been pierced at its heart. Victors could parade the captured flag publicly, use it for propaganda, or display it as ultimate proof of dominance.
Morale and political effects: Such a loss could accelerate surrender negotiations, demoralize the broader population and remaining forces, or even contribute to regime change. It demonstrated that the defending government had lost control of its own symbolic center.
Propaganda trophy: Captured capital flags were prized exhibits. They proved the enemy capital had fallen or been successfully raided, often leading to widespread celebration back home and despair in the defeated nation.
Historical Context and Examples Direct examples of a national flag being captured in active battle on capitol grounds are relatively rare because capitals were often evacuated or defended indirectly, but related events show the gravity:
War of 1812 – British Capture of Washington, D.C. (1814): After defeating American forces at Bladensburg, British troops entered the largely undefended U.S. capital. They raised the Union Jack (British flag) over key buildings like the Capitol, burned public structures (White House, Capitol), and looted items. While not a classic "battlefield flag capture" amid heavy fighting on the grounds, this occupation was seen as a massive humiliation for the young United States. The British did not prominently parade a captured Stars and Stripes as a battlefield trophy in the same way, but the event itself (including symbolic occupation) was a propaganda coup.
Napoleonic Wars: Armies frequently captured enemy capitals (e.g., French taking Vienna or Berlin, Coalition forces taking Paris in 1814). Captured regimental colors and standards were paraded as trophies. Entering and controlling the enemy capital with captured symbols reinforced the narrative of total victory. Napoleon’s forces, for instance, made political use of such triumphs. In general 19th-century practice, the location mattered intensely: A flag taken in the capital carried far more weight than one seized on a distant battlefield, as it struck at the symbolic and administrative core of the nation.
🔥Practical Outcome—-SHIFTS IN LEADERSHIP!!🔥 The war itself did not automatically end (armies could fight on from elsewhere), but it often forced major concessions, armistice talks, or shifts in leadership. The captured flag would typically be sent back to the victor’s capital for display, preserved in museums, or returned decades later as a goodwill gesture after peace. In summary, it was the ultimate 19th-century military humiliation — combining tactical success, national dishonor, and psychological dominance. Modern parallels (e.g., raising a flag over a conquered capital) still echo this ancient symbolism of conquest.
