This is a fascinating Why Files about the secretive things DARPA is up to. Some have been good, and some have been very, very bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo68B3UG9VU
My TLDW: 51-minute video. Minute 1 is the intro, minutes 2 - 4 are an ad, resumes at minute 5.
The first segment is aboutl the history of DARPA and explains many of the amazing things that DARPA has invented: DARPA created the internet, micro-processing chips, GPS, cell phones, and AI. They’ve advanced the medical field by creating ultrasound, MRI, advanced prosthetics, diagnose illness earlier, and improve transplants surgeries… and this is the tip of the iceberg.
Then it goes into the creepy/disturbing things that DARPA has invented, such as self-guided bullets, bending light to make objects invisible, living construction materials, remote controlled rats, using insects to destroy crops, miniature flying cyborgs that look like flying insects, etc. They are working on autonomous killer robot soldiers, creating exoskeletons to make soldiers stronger with weapons inside the exoskeleton, and modifying humans to give them “superhuman capabilities” without any extra equipment, ie limb regeneration.
At the 22-minute mark, he explains that DARPA wanted to mass surveil everyone, but it was illegal for them to do so, they couldn’t manage so much data, and surveillance doesn’t work when people are aware of being surveilled. This led to DARPA creating a think tank — a private organization with no oversight — that disbursed DARPA funds to organizations such has the National Science Federation, which in turn gave the funds to companies that would do this surveillance for them, such as Google.
At the 30-minute mark, he explains how DARPA was behind creating and utilizing Agent Orange in violation of international war crime laws. The US continued to use it long after the US knew how devastating it was to both the locals and the American soldiers exposed to it. The US has never taken responsibility for this and still denies that it violated war crime laws or harmed people.
At the 40-minute mark the most damning statistics come out:
DARPA is an agency of 220 people with a budget of $4 billion dollars.
No transparency. Exempt from many laws other government agencies have to follow, such as hiring practices, managing personnel and managing budgets. The are allowed to fund projects via “other transactions” with no congressional approval or oversight. The defense contractor CEOs get to decide what DARPA funds, the same people who financially benefit from these contracts. DARPA is the agency that drives the military industrial complex, which is exactly what Eisenhower had warned us about decades ago.
He closes by pondering whether the good outweighs the bad.
However, since 2021, only 127 of President Joe Biden’s initial 560 White House employees remain – a stunning 77-percent turnover rate.
The White House payroll reaches historic highs not seen since President Richard Nixon in 1971.
u/Yinz posted this a few weeks ago and it didn't get much attention: https://greatawakening.win/p/17tKeAs96i/this-missed-my-radar-ebay-stalke/c/
I am reposting with a TLDW to help raise awareness of what kind of weird things our federal government is up to.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=GnQMuS87gLw
The video is 44-minute video (first 2-minutes are ads). Here is my summary:
In 2019, a husband-wife blogger duo said some critical —but fair —things about e-bay on their blog, which was quite popular and had a big following. Angered by the negative PR, the e-bay president (or was he CEO?) decided to get even. The executives had a meeting in which they hatched a plan to terrorize the bloggers, then e-bay would swoop in and “save” them from this terrorization, and then the bloggers would portray e-bay as heroes on their blog.
The head of security was in charge of executing the plan. He got all the executives and many other employees to set up fake accounts and burner phones. Every day they’d deliver something creepy, including insects, the mask that a killer wore in a horror movie, a book about coping with the death of a spouse, a funeral wreath, etc. They tried to order a pig fetus, but the company they'd ordered it from was suspicious and would not send the ordered item. After each delivery, the couple would get text messages asking if they liked their gifts.
E-bay also had employees fly to Boston, rent cars, and follow the couple around every time the couple left the house. I think they may have graffitied or otherwise vandalized the house, too, but maybe I am remembering that wrong.
The couple was indeed terrified. They had no idea who was doing this to them. They slept in separate rooms so that if they were broken into at night, one or the other could escape. The couple got the police were involved, and if I remember correctly. it was the police that figured out it was e-bay doing this.
A criminal case ensued. E-bay had a private meeting with the DA (or was it attorney general?) about the case, and suddenly after the meeting, the nature of the prosecution changed. I think it was 6 or 7 lower level employees were convicted, but all the executives got off Scott free. The president (CEO?) got a golden parachute, another executive left under favorable terms.
The couple took the evidence from the criminal case and filed a civil case. In the criminal case, it was disclosed that the head of security was former CIA. In the civil case, it came out that he was actually still active CIA, and that other people at e-bay (specifically the president/CEO) may have been recruited by him to be involved in a CIA operation. Then the State Department stepped in and classified the evidence in the trial. Its the only time a civil case has been classified for national security reasons.
The head of security/CIA guy sounds like a real psycho. He used to regularly show his staff movie clips of snitches being murdered, such as when Denzel Washington shot a guy in a film.
Anyway, a lot of questions have been raised. Did e-bay knowingly hire an active CIA agent? Was e-bay a CIA front? If so, was it a front all along or did it become a front somewhere along the way? How many more of the staff were CIA agents? Why would the CIA want to use e-bay for secret operations? And what was e-bay doing that warranted the regular showing of movie clips of snitches being murdered????
I posted this earlier, but am reposting with a catchier title. The TLDR: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) receives it's funding from the Federal Reserve, not congress. The Supreme Court deemed that it's legal to fund this way.
From: https://api.neonemails.com/emails/content/W2SgVUeIucJezpq0cZ7wn80_cWsqI92Yz15ncUA4ddI=
This morning, the Supreme Court preserved the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by upholding the agency’s funding mechanism as constitutional in a 7-2 vote.
The justices’ decision caps a battle that marked the biggest legal threat to the CFPB since it was established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to crack down on predatory lending and enforce consumer protection laws.
Two lender trade associations, backed by business groups and all the nation’s Republican state attorneys general, contended the agency’s funding from the Federal Reserve violates Congress’s power of the purse. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected that argument and sided with the Biden administration. Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented, writing that since the “earliest days” of the nation, Congress’s power of the purse has been its most “complete and effectual weapon.”
Established as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, lawmakers looked to insulate the CFPB by creating a funding mechanism outside Congress’s annual appropriations process. Republicans have long targeted the independent agency, lamenting that lawmakers have little control over it. Former House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and 132 Republican members of Congress filed briefs backing the challengers.
The high court acknowledged that the CFPB is “different” than other agencies but determined its method of drawing funds from the Federal Reserve System that its director has deemed “reasonably necessary to carry out” is constitutional.
From: https://api.neonemails.com/emails/content/W2SgVUeIucJezpq0cZ7wn80_cWsqI92Yz15ncUA4ddI=
This morning, the Supreme Court preserved the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by upholding the agency’s funding mechanism as constitutional in a 7-2 vote.
The justices’ decision caps a battle that marked the biggest legal threat to the CFPB since it was established in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to crack down on predatory lending and enforce consumer protection laws.
Two lender trade associations, backed by business groups and all the nation’s Republican state attorneys general, contended the agency’s funding from the Federal Reserve violates Congress’s power of the purse. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected that argument and sided with the Biden administration. Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented, writing that since the “earliest days” of the nation, Congress’s power of the purse has been its most “complete and effectual weapon.”
Established as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, lawmakers looked to insulate the CFPB by creating a funding mechanism outside Congress’s annual appropriations process. Republicans have long targeted the independent agency, lamenting that lawmakers have little control over it. Former House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and 132 Republican members of Congress filed briefs backing the challengers.
The high court acknowledged that the CFPB is “different” than other agencies but determined its method of drawing funds from the Federal Reserve System that its director has deemed “reasonably necessary to carry out” is constitutional.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZRwlYtAMps
55-minutes (the first 4 minutes are ads, last few minutes credits, so about 45-minutes of content)
My TLDW:
He starts by explaining that patents can be seized by the government if they “are important for national security.”
Then he talks about a couple of inventors who invented cars that could run on literal gas vapors, making mileage like 200 miles a gallon (first one was over 100 years ago, I think the second one was sixties?). Then a guy who invented a car that ran on water (early 70s). Then some people who created machines that could generate energy out of the atmosphere, which is basically unlimited free energy (one of them in the 60s).
All these people had their patents seized, labs broken into and all their material stolen and were either financially/professionally ruined or killed (or both).
Interestingly, one guy re-patented all these things with the US military as the owner of the patents, so it appears that the military has stolen these patents and are utilizing these technologies while keeping them from the public.
He goes on to talk about the serious flaws with the current green energy “solutions” being touted.
He shows that there never was an energy shortage, it was a control tool and that the green energy “solutions” are simply measures that will ensure that powerful people stay in power.
This is a fascinating video from 1986. It has me now re-thinking everything I thought I knew about nuclear power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VvGw1tkT1Q
Video is 48-minutes. My TLDW:
Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist who began his work in 1947. Galen is renowned; he worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage. He shows that fear of radiation has been exaggerated to scare people … so a few powerful people can maintain total control of the world’s most valuable power resource. Filmed by Ben Williams in 1986.
He says that there is no such thing as “nuclear waste” because the plutonium is recyclable. He also says plutonium and uranium not nearly as dangerous as advertised. He even eats a piece of radioactive material on camera!
He alleges that the lies about the danger of nuclear are designed to scam energy customers to pay extra fees to the government for special “housing” while the plant is in service, and then happily relinquish ownership of the “waste” to the government. He hints that the government is essentially stealing valuable assets from its rightful owners, who are the consumers who paid to have the material refined for their electrical grids.
He alleges the nuclear “waste” isn’t really buried, that they are empty containers (or maybe contain evidence of crimes, such as dead bodies) and the real plutonium is stolen by bad actors who understand the tremendous value (he indicated mafia). He says another bonus of the “waste” being illegal to dig up is that no one will ever try to gather the evidence that was buried down there.
He says the value of the nuclear “waste” is more than the national debt (this video was made while Reagan was president). He claims the insurance industry also knows and turns a blind eye because they can charge nuclear power customers enormous amounts of extra premiums to ensure the plants.
He claims the three-mile island nuclear disaster wasn’t an accident — 2 months prior to the plant opening, they were warned the equipment was set up wrong and would cause issues within a year, yet they knowingly moved forward and the “accident” happened exactly one year after they opened. He said they also distorted the info to make the “accident" look worse than it was (ie saying it was running at over 4,000 degrees, in a tone that indicated it was abnormally hot when it is the normal running temp, etc). Shutting down nuclear plants for “safety concerns” also jacks up prices to consumers and pushes other types of power consumption.
He thinks there should be a small, locally run nuclear reactor every 10 blocks that power individual neighborhoods = energy independence for each neighborhood. He says that these little reactors can be mass-produced cheaply, but the federal energy cartel will never go for it because they want to set the price, availability and whether you can hook on to it (power, domain and control).
Side note: Relatively early on in the video, he claimed that after WW2, the United States gave Russia the plans to build their own nuclear weapons along with the materials to do so. My thought on that was “All wars are bankers wars. The bankers fund both sides.” In this case, the Powers that Be made sure that both sides had nuclear weapons in order ensure that we all live in perpetual fear of nuclear war.
Here is the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority's page about their weather modification program: https://sawpa.gov/santa-ana-river-watershed-weather-modification/
The program started on November 15, 2023 and will last through April 2027.
Unfortunately, it looks like they update the schedule retroactively, so we don't know what days they did cloud seed, just what days they did it.
Audra Morgan of Eye of the Storm did an investigative journalism story on her podcast: https://rumble.com/v4cikou-eye-of-the-storm-s2-e46-021024-riding-solo.html
From Law Enforcement Today on 12-15-2023: https://lawenforcementtoday.com/no-this-isnt-satire-newly-sworn-los-angeles-police-officers-daca-recipients-who-entered-us-illegally
...people who entered the country illegally will be on the streets of LA enforcing the law. No, this is not satire from the Babylon Bee.
Worse yet, the group of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) LAPD recruits are not, by virtue of their undocumented status, permitted to carry their city-issued firearms when they are off-duty, NBC Los Angeles reports.
Under federal law, DACA aliens are prohibited from possessing either guns or ammunition, but the LAPD has found a workaround for that little problem. They will simply consider off-duty hours part of the definition of “performance of their official duties or other law enforcement purpose,” which will allow these individuals to carry their issued firearms off-duty, a new police policy memo reads...
...In September 2022, the California state senate removed the requirement that California police officers must be U.S. citizens under Senate Bill 960. The only requirement is that officers be “legally authorized to work in the United States.”...
...In April, Colorado, vying to be “California lite,” passed similar legislation that allows DACA recipients to become police officers and possess firearms in the course of their duty.
DACA was signed into law by leftist President Barack Obama in 2012 and provides protection from deportation for some 600,000 people who were brought to the U.S. without legal status (illegally) before the age of 16 and who’ve lived in the country continuously since 2007. However, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security says that DACA is “not itself a type of legal residency.”
From Law Enforcement Today: https://lawenforcementtoday.com/the-un-laundering-us-taxpayer-money-is-funding-our-demise-the-invasion-at-the-southern-border
...The New York Post recently published a piece reporting the UN’s release of the 2024 “Inter-Agency Coordination Platform for Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela (otherwise known as R4V for short), which outlines a $1.6 billion outlay from the UN to 17 Latin American countries.
That document, the article notes, confirmed that the United Nations, along with 248 identified non-governmental organizations (NGOs), hands out debit cards to illegal aliens, which American taxpayers primarily fund.
The title of R4V is misleading, however, giving the impression that the funding is only for Venezuelans. Todd Bensman, the author of the Post article, draws attention to the document’s fine print (footnote on page 14 and a paragraph on page 43) that notes the money goes to “all nationalities” and “multiple other nationalities.”
In that document–in black and white–it specifically says that the UN and sundry NGOs are indeed funding the illegal alien invasion at our southern border, which is indisputable for so-called “fact checkers.”
The UN and its partners in crime are committed to spending at least $372 million in “Cash and Voucher Assistance (CVA)” and “Multipurpose Cash Assistance (MCA)” to over half a million illegal aliens (624,300 in total) expected to make the trek to the United States this year.
Most of the money comes in the form of pre-paid, rechargeable debit cards. However, some are given in the form of “cash in envelopes,” bank transfers, and mobile transfers that those heading to the US can spend in any manner they wish.
The UN report explains the handouts have “taken on increasing importance” in order to give the ever-increasing number of illegals “the flexibility to cover their expenses and needs they deem most urgent, increasing their dignity and autonomy.”
As a point of information, a 2023 report from the Council on Foreign Relations showed United States taxpayers gave the United Nations over $12 billion in 2021, a reversal of policies implemented by President Trump, who reduced funding to some UN agencies.
...In sum, the United Nations and many NGOs are money laundering US taxpayer money to fund our own invasion. It is far beyond time to shut off the spigot and stop funding the UN, which is hell-bent on destroying our country.
Sermons from 1992: Are the recent discoveries on the Planet Mars really monuments built by some other culture? Is the mile-wide "Face" a carefully crafted monument, or simply a natural aberration? Is there a link between the "pyramids" on Mars, and the Great Pyramid of Egypt? Has all this been described in the Bible?
Part One: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkrfj16SwCw
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRXW8PrkKwo&t=2s
My opinion: While part 1 is interesting, the first 40-minutes of part 2 is a review of part 1. If you are short on time, you can skip part 1.
The reason why I posted this is because of what he said in the last 15-minutes of part 2, which I think accurately predicted what is happening now with all the alien information coming out.
He said that in the end times, there will be a new world-wide religion. Missler thought that the new world religion will revolve around "aliens" in order to deceive us away from Christ, but I think that thanks to all the info that has come out about Project Blue Beam, we won't be dumb enough to fall for the alien invasion scam.
Back in 1992, no one ever saw transhumanism coming. I think transhumanism does qualify as a religion, and the recent world-wide push by the UN and companies such as Blackrock to force countries/corporations to adopt and push transhumanism qualifies it as the prophesied new world religion.
This woman is a sanitation engineer in Chicago. She realized that one of the EPA approved chemicals that they use as an alternative to chlorine for those who cannot tolerate chlorine (ie NICUs), called Fulton Chloride Blend, has amazing health benefits.
She has started selling it as a health hacking product. She said many other health products, ie ozone, have come from the water treatment world.
So "they" are poisoning our water with chlorine needlessly when "they" could be improving our health with other water treatment products.
Podcast, video and full transcript: https://www.life-enthusiast.com/articles/podcast-460-wetway-with-emma-flanagan/
First of All, thank you all for being prayer warriors for all of my big battles against government corruption. I am again asking for prayer for another battle.
On Wednesday, I will be giving a speech at the California income agency's board meeting. I recently exposed a bombshell -- a large percentage of the agency's executive staff are working unlawfully without an oath or a bond. A few months ago, I notified dozens of agency employees that they had been ordered to commit unlawful activities at the behest of people who had never sworn to uphold the laws, and let the employees know that I was pursuing consequences against each of them personally for these crimes. As far as I can tell, nothing came of that.
There will be a lot of people both within and outside the agency watching. Please pray that this bombshell being exposed forces the agency to reform itself. Please pray that they don't disconnect me (the meeting is virtual and they have disconnected me in the past), that I don't have any technical problems and that the agency doesn't do anything to retaliate (they have retaliated before).
For those wanting an update about the State Senators that I've caught without oaths and bonds (https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSscMqGI/need-advice--california-state-se/), I'll post that update in a few weeks. That update is giant, and due to a family emergency, I can't parse so much info right now.
Thank you again! I love you guys!
https://www.wnd.com/2023/11/san-diego-mayor-sued-anti-christian-retaliation/
A pastor in California has filed a lawsuit against San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria over Gloria's insistence that he be removed from the San Diego's Citizens Advisory Board on Police/Community Relations because of his belief in the Bible.
The case is on behalf of Dennis Hodges of the Church of Yeshua Ha Mashiach, and he had served on the commission since 2017.
But when he abstained from a vote condemning "transphobia," his fellow commissioners told him to leave, and eventually they "influenced" Gloria to veto Hodge's reappointment.
A report at the Washington Stand said the lawsuit charges, "This is an action for the unlawful discrimination and retaliation against Mr. Dennis Hodges, a devoted Christian pastor and public servant."
It charges the mayor "under the influence of several of Mr. Hodges’ fellow commissioners, retaliated and discriminated against Mr. Hodges for adhering to his religious beliefs regarding gender identity and transgenderism."
The report noted the commission voted in November 2021 on "a letter from the city of San Diego Human Relations Commissioner Tootie Thomas Regarding Ending Discrimination and Transphobia by Amplifying the Visibility and Voices of the Transgender Community."
The idea was to publicize a letter promoting the local government's plan to end "transphobia," that claim that those who do not approve of the transgender ideology somehow fear or hate it.
Hodges abstained, explaining, about transgenderism, "I love all people. I love transgenders as well. But to me, it’s an abomination to the eyes of God, so I don’t agree with it."
Other commissioners, the lawsuit charges, immediate began "a crusade to cancel a man for holding traditional, religious beliefs regarding the biological nature of a man and woman."
That scheme failed, but then Gloria vetoed Hodges's reappointment. He claimed the pastor made "repeated concerning public comments about LGBTQ people."
So the complaint now charges Gloria with making his decision "against Mr. Hodges solely based on his beliefs on human creation and transgenderism — issues that are unrelated to his role on the Advisory Board."
Hodges released a statement through his lawyers at Advocates for Faith and Freedom and said, "I am standing up for religious people nationwide who have been discriminated against solely because of their faith. What happened to me at the hands of our government should never happen to anyone else."
The complaint seeks damages and reinstatement.
Lawyer Julianne Fleischer told the Stand, "No government authority should be able to wield their authority to attack other public servants for holding traditional, biblical values."
Saturday, October 28, 2023 Contact: (916) 210-6000, [email protected] Secures administrative stay of dangerous district court decision in assault weapons ban challenge
OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued the following statement in response to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ order granting an administrative stay of a district court decision invalidating the state’s assault weapons ban. As a result of the Ninth Circuit’s order, California’s ban on assault weapons remains in effect until further notice. The Ninth Circuit also expedited the appeal in this case and placed it on calendar for oral argument in December 2023.
“Weapons of war do not belong on our streets. We were once again reminded of this fact as we witnessed a mass shooter gun down dozens of people in Maine, killing 18 victims,” said Attorney General Bonta. “We must protect our communities from these dangerous weapons. We know that these restrictions work to prevent mass casualty events and save lives. It is no accident that California’s gun death rate is 43% lower than the rest of the nation — it is because of our lifesaving gun safety laws, such as the assault weapons ban. Today’s decision means that it remains unlawful to purchase, transfer, or possess assault weapons in California as we continue to defend the law on appeal and seek reversal of the dangerous and misguided district court decision that, if upheld, would put our communities at grave risk.”
The Ninth Circuit granted an administrative stay on the district court decision, after Attorney General Bonta argued that the district court’s application of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen is deeply flawed and ignores relevant historical laws. The Ninth Circuit decision stays a district court decision enjoining California’s decades-old assault weapons ban, the Assault Weapons Control Act. The Assault Weapons Control Act was initially passed in 1989 following two mass shootings, including one at a California school. The legislature strengthened those provisions in 2000. For the last three decades, California has restricted the manufacture, distribution, transportation, importation, sale, lending, and possession of firearms that qualify as “assault weapons” under California law. Those weapons have specific tactical enhancements or configurations that make the weapons more dangerous to the public and law enforcement and more susceptible to criminal misuse. Data reflect that assault weapons in general are used disproportionately in crime relative to their market presence, that they are used often to commit mass shootings, and that they inflict more numerous and more extensive injuries than other weapons. Assault weapons have been used in numerous horrific mass shootings throughout the country, including the mass shootings in Orlando in 2016, Sutherland Springs in 2017, Parkland in 2018, and Uvalde in 2022.
Attorney General Bonta stands with partners throughout the state to continue tackling the issue of gun violence strategically and aggressively by:
Defending California's common sense gun safety laws, including by obtaining a stay of an order enjoining California's restrictions on large-capacity magazines. Educating the public on gun violence prevention through the Office of Gun Violence Prevention, including through the first-ever data report issued by the office to provide a robust review of gun violence data in California and throughout the U.S. and to help guide policy and strategy discussions related to reducing gun violence. Advocating for gun laws including by sponsoring Assembly Bill 1594 to increase accountability for the firearm industry, working to strengthen federal laws to protect the public from ghost guns, and successfully defending California’s laws to prevent gun violence. Seizing guns from prohibited persons in the Armed and Prohibited Persons System, and through multiagency sweeps in the Bay Area and Los Angeles County, conducting operations targeting individuals attempting to illegally purchase guns, and collaborating with local law enforcement partners. Ending the sale of illegal firearms through litigation against ghost gun retailers, and by putting a stop to the sale of illegal assault weapons in Orange County A copy of the decision can be found here.
Hey all,
I'ts a looonnng story, but here is a brief overview: I requested a copy of the oath of office for my state senator, Senate Pro-Tempore Toni Atkins and her deputy, Jason Weisz. The oaths came back with all signatures redacted, which indicates to me that one or both of the oaths was never fully executed. But they didn't redact the dates, and both oaths had already expired, which means both Atkins and Weisz are currently working unlawfully.
I filed a bond complaint against both Atkins and Weisz and against the two FOIA people who improperly redacted the documents. No word back on that and Atkins is still working.
I have contacted a bunch of republican organizations, who I thought would be eager to get Atkins arrested for violating Government Code sections 1360, 1362-1369 and Section 3 of Article XX of the Constitution of California, which per Title 18 U.S.C. § 912, includes fines and/or three years imprisonment. Also, all the work she's done since the expiration has to be voided (and if she never signed that oath, everything she's ever done has to be voided). Not a peep from any of them, which makes me think that maybe some republicans are working without proper oaths, too.
Curious about who else didn't have properly executed oaths, I made a request for 22 more oaths, including Scott Weiner's. They have a 2-week turn time. It has now been 7-weeks, and the Senate Committee has made it clear that this request will be "in process" indefinitely and never be fulfilled. I complained to his HR about the FOIA people violating the laws by not providing the documents, and HR didn't do anything
Toni Atkins and Scott Weiner are at the forefront of creating and pushing laws to destroy families and transition children behind parents backs. I feel like there are other groups who will run with this information and get them ousted. Do you guys have any suggestions on who I should contact/what other steps I should take?
I've posted on here several times over the last few years with prayer requests. I have caught California's income tax agency, The Franchise Tax Board, running eight bona fide criminal schemes to overcharge taxpayers. Summary: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=611
I first became aware that there was a legit embezzlement/racketeering scheme going on in late 2016. I knew at that moment that it was my calling from God to put a stop to it. I have been fighting them ever since... and the more evidence I've collected, the more and more crimes I've documented.
A couple of years ago, I realized that the system is rigged to protect the schemes and the people who masterminded the schemes. I realized that the most likely way to stop the unlawful schemes is to get the staff to decide to refuse to comply with unlawful and unethical behavior any more.
It's a long story, but I think today may be the "Come to Jesus" moment for the staff. If not today, I think it'll happen soon. I am asking for prayers for the staff to be emboldened to stand up to management and refuse to comply any longer. Once the staff refuses to comply, things will turn around quickly to improve the system for everyone in California.
