I just made a post about the fact that Scott Wiener's oath of office expired in 2018. I notified him that he was working unlawfully in January. He still has't signed an oath, so the lack of oath clearly wasn't an "error" or "oversight." I'm trying to figure out now how to force him out of office.
Edit to add: I wanted to confirm that Wiener was on the committee that shut this bill down.
One of the people on the committee that killed this bill was State Senator representing San Francisco, Scott Wiener. Wiener does not have a current oath in place. His oath expired in 2018 (Wiener is at almost the very bottom, so you have to do a lot of scrolling): https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608
On January 11, 2024, I sent an email notifying the Senate Committee and Senator Wiener’s entire staff that he was working unlawfully without an oath. On March 27, 2024, the Secretary of State confirmed that Mr. Weisz still does not have an oath on file, so this appears to be flagrant violation of the oath laws. Clearly, if the lack of current oath had been an oversight, the Senate Committee would have immediately corrected it by having him sign an oath.
Likewise, all 19 of the Senate Staffers that I pulled oaths on are working unlawfully without oaths (see same link as above, the rest of them are directly above Scott Wiener).
Guys, we need to clean house!
I just want everyone to know that State Senator representing San Francisco, Scott Wiener, does not have a current oath in place. His oath expired in 2018 (Wiener is at almost the very bottom, so you have to do a lot of scrolling): https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608
On January 11, 2024, I sent an email notifying the Senate Committee and Senator Wiener’s entire staff that he was working unlawfully without an oath. On March 27, 2024, the Secretary of State confirmed that Mr. Weisz still does not have an oath on file, so this appears to be flagrant violation of the oath laws. Clearly, if the lack of current oath had been an oversight, the Senate Committee would have immediately corrected it by having him sign an oath.
Likewise, all 19 of the Senate Staffers that I pulled oaths on are working unlawfully without oaths (see same link as above, the rest of them are directly above Scott Wiener).
Guys, we need to clean house!
They've expanded to be bigger than only bonds. The People's Operation Restoration has the same people that Bonds for the Win did, but they've added a lot more people helping to run it and have more/more powerful strategies in place to take down the illegitimate governments.
WOW! Thank you so much for citing me!
I am almost done with my letter to federal regulators about 20 people in the State Senate working unlawfully without oaths (the state senate staff is at the bottom, so scroll all the way down): https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608
Once it is sent off, I will start on some other strategies to force them out of their jobs: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2644
Meanwhile, in that post GW post that you referenced about, TRYNIEN-2 cited a legal ruling (copied below) that made me realize we can simply take Scott Wiener's office away from him since he has no oath. I am trying to get in touch with my Bay Area peeps to see if we can make this happen:
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958) Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821)
Bonds for the win has closed down and reinvented itself as the People's Operation Restoration: https://thepeoplesoperationrestoration.com. It is bigger and better than before. It is the largest grassroots movement in the world, with over 2 million people registered in their "Army of Light."
Both Federal and California State laws require that all government employees have bonds. California stopped issuing bonds when Reagan was president. This means the entire state government is illegitimate and we the people have the legal right to just step in and take it over: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219
Likewise, a large percentage of our government officials have not taken proper oaths, including San Francisco's State Senator Scott Wiener (Wiener's oath is nearly at the bottom, so lots of scrolling down to find him): https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608.
Anyone without an oath has no right to be in office. For elected officials, someone can just swoop in and take over: "The obligation imposed by the Public Officers Law statute is personal to plaintiff, it is an act he is required to do and the office became vacant by the mere failure to file the oath, whether or not the defendants knew or were chargeable with notice that plaintiff had failed to file his oath, and they are not required to make any declaration or give any notice. On his default in' filing his official oath "the appointment was vitiated and the office * * * became vacant" [citing Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 N.Y. 400, 36 N.E.2d 637; and also People ex reI. Walton v. Hicks, infra].
I am trying to talk to people in the Bay Area now and try to encourage them to find a replacement for Wiener and just swoop in and take over his job since the legal right is there to do so.
Both Federal and California State laws require that all government employees have bonds. California stopped issuing bonds when Reagan was president. This means the entire state government is illegitimate and we the people have the legal right to just step in and take it over: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219
Likewise, a large percentage of our government officials have not taken proper oaths, including San Francisco's State Senator Scott Wiener (Wiener's oath is nearly at the bottom, so lots of scrolling down to find him): https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608.
Anyone without an oath has no right to be in office. For elected officials, someone can just swoop in and take over: "The obligation imposed by the Public Officers Law statute is personal to plaintiff, it is an act he is required to do and the office became vacant by the mere failure to file the oath, whether or not the defendants knew or were chargeable with notice that plaintiff had failed to file his oath, and they are not required to make any declaration or give any notice. On his default in' filing his official oath "the appointment was vitiated and the office * * * became vacant" [citing Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 N.Y. 400, 36 N.E.2d 637; and also People ex reI. Walton v. Hicks, infra].
I am trying to talk to people in the Bay Area now and try to encourage them to find a replacement for Wiener and just swoop in and take over his job since the legal right is there to do so.
Thank you. The reason I dug up the Jesson v. David court case was because California's constitution has a second paragraph, and none of the oaths I received had that second paragraph. I did some digging to find out why. Since I am fighting California corruption, I have mostly focused on CA laws, but since I have been wrestling in the swamp, I throw in some federal statutes sometimes, too. :)
Before I started doing my own legal work to fight government corruption, I didn't see the connection, either. But now I understand (by learning the hard way) that statutory law is all about deception via precise wording and distortions of wording so that people think it says one thing when it really means something else altogether.
Check out https://thepeoplesoperationrestoration.com for more information about the corporation capital letter slavery system that was imposed on the United States by the parasite class, and how Trump fits into it all.
Again, thank you so much! You are making this complaint writing so much easier for me!!!! You have no idea how much I appreciate your helping me.
But I do have a question: I hadn't seen Eisenhower's EO before, but wasn't this deemed unconstitutional in the Supreme Court? I ask based on this gem that I'd found:
Jesson v. David (2002):
“…the California Supreme Court in Vogel v. County of Los Angeles (1967) 68 Cal. 2d 18 found paragraph 2 of the oath to be invalid under the United States Constitution. That is, it would violate the Constitution of the United States for California to require that language. Our high court concluded that two decisions of the United States Supreme Court, Elfbrandt v. Russell (1966) 384 U.S. 11, and Keyishian v. Board of Regents (1967) 385 U.S. 589, compelled such a result.”
Thank you so much for this. I am getting ready to file another complaint, and I will be adding this to the complaint!
Yes, treason of oath is punishable with death. Not taking an oath is punishable with three years in prison.
Edit to add an excerpt from a claim I filed against the California income tax agency: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2073
"All ten of these people do not have properly executed Oaths of Allegiance as (STD 689) as is required per Government Code sections 1360, 1362-1369 and Section 3 of Article XX of the Constitution of California. Without a fully executed Oath, these people have been working for The State of California unlawfully and are considered foreign agents posing as government officials. Under Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 912, this is a felony punishable with up to three years in federal prison.
Prima fascia evidence indicates that all ten of the Accused knowingly chose not to promise to uphold the laws of the state and federal constitutions. All of the Accused are/were upper management, and as was documented in the court case Christine N. Grab vs. The California Franchise Tax Board, many of them were overseeing the execution and/or cover-up of bona fide criminal schemes to overcharge taxpayers. It appears that evading Government Code sections 1360, 1362-1369 and Section 3 of Article XX of the Constitution of California via improperly executed oaths is another facet of these criminal schemes."
This is all California specific, but it will give you the gist of how you do it: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1472
edit 2: I've updated the post to include a sample request letter.
I haven't finished uploading all the oaths that I've received, but the vast majority of the California State Senate employees that I requested oaths for don't have oaths. Neither do 9 of the executives at the California Income Tax agency, and on February 1, 2024, the tax agency said they believed their unexecuted oaths were valid. There are a LOT of California public officials who don't have oaths, especially people who are registered with the BAR and people who are in executive positions: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=1608
And no one in California is bonded, which means the entire California government is illegitimate: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=2219
I believe that home school coops are the future of education for this country. I'd love to see a network of them set up in my area.
In years past, one of the main limiting factors was parents couldn't be involved because of work schedules, but now with more and more people working from home on flexible schedules, it can be a reality for a large percentage of families.
I know, right? Blackrock appears to be determined to destroy everything good in the world...
Calvert was great.
Homeschool communities are amazing these days. I'm glad that your granddaughters will be raised in one. The investment pays off in spades.
Thank you so much for digging up this information for me. This is why I love the GA community so much. The people on GA are awesome at digging up information.
When I got that email this morning, my instincts told me that something like this had happened, but I haven't had a chance yet today to dig for myself. I really appreciate that you took the time and effort to dig for me. :)
The information you dug up also explains why a couple of years ago, Calvert stopped allowing students to do their paper curriculum and forced everyone into the online curriculum.
It also explains why Calvert allowed school districts to utilize their platforms during Covid lockdowns. The parents who I talked to thought they were using Calvert curriculum, not school district curriculum, and were complaining about the curriculum. They were shocked when I told them that the curriculum my child had was completely different from what their kids had. It surprised me that Calvert would allow their brand to be damaged, but now I see why they didn't care.
ha ha! Who knows?
No explanation was given. And strangely, their logo has suddenly changed. The new logo + the sentence "...our leading providers of curriculum" leads me to believe that Calvert was purchased by another company and shut down.
I follow the California Income Tax Agency very closely. Every December, the public is welcome to make suggestions to the board of directors and executives on how to better serve the public. Most years, the speakers are very polite. This last December, the speakers were shredding the income tax agency on how their unfriendly business policies were creating a mass exodus of businesses. I think its a good sign of how the CA constituents are feeling about our state government: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWpTp8n1j6Q (the speeches start at 1 hour, 38-minutes)
Thank you for pointing out that there is a definite difference between air bubbles versus the foam that is created when there are things in your urine that are not supposed there. If your urine looks like a draft beer, see a doctor.
As a FYI, my foam never stayed in the toilet after it was flushed.
I also cured (at least mostly cured) my kidney disease via natural remedies. The treatments the doctors offered me had a low success rate and heinous side effects. There was no way I was going to give myself heart problems in the hopes that maybe my kidneys would get better.
I can't seem to find it now, but Kim Iverson did a video about a city counsel meeting that she attended in Los Angeles during covid. As you recall, during covid, people were not required to pay rent, leaving landlords in a bad predicament because the landlords still had to pay the mortgages. At the meeting, the politicians talked about how they were going to acquire all these multifamily properties from these landlords in dire straits and the city would use them as housing for the homeless.